Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33054630›Full record

ArticleTherapeutic advances in respiratory disease

Early predictors for mechanical ventilation in COVID-19 patients.

Wen Li, Fengyu Lin, Minhui Dai, Lingli Chen, Duoduo Han, Yanhui Cui, Pinhua Pan

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Therapeutic advances in respiratory disease. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Combining blood glucose and SpOScientific reports · 2023
    Article
  8. Study of Biochemical Parameters as Predictors for Need of Invasive Ventilation in Severely Ill COVID-19 Patients.Journal of critical care medicine (Universitatea de Medicina si Farmacie din Targu-Mures) · 2023
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Observational
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Wen LiThe Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Xiangya Hospital Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China.ORCID 0000-0002-5985-8285
Fengyu LinThe Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Xiangya Hospital Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China.
Minhui DaiThe Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Xiangya Hospital Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China.
Lingli ChenThe Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Xiangya Hospital Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China.
Duoduo HanThe Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Xiangya Hospital Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China.
Yanhui CuiThe Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Xiangya Hospital Central South University, Changsha, Hunan 410008, China.
Pinhua PanThe Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Xiangya Hospital Central South University, Changsha, Hunan 410008, China.
Central South University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo identify potential predictors for invasive and non-invasive mechanical ventilation in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients.

methodsThis study retrospectively analyzes data of 516 patients with confirmed COVID-19, who were categorized into three groups based on which mechanical ventilation method was used during the hospitalization period.

resultsAmong 516 confirmed cases with COVID-19, 446 patients did not receive mechanical ventilation, 38 patients received invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) and 32 received non-invasive mechanical ventilation (NIMV). The median age of the included patients was 61 years old (interquartile range, 52-69). A total of 432 patients had one or more coexisting illnesses. The main clinical symptoms included fever (79.46%), dry cough (66.47%) and shortness of breath (46.90%). IMV and NIMV patients included more men, more coexisting illnesses and received more medication. Patients in the IMV group and NIMV had higher leukocyte and neutrophil count, lower lymphocyte count, higher aspartate aminotransferase (AST), lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), C-reactive protein (CRP), procalcitonin (PCT) and D-dimer levels and lower albumin (ALB) level. The univariate and multiple logistic regression analysis showed that the use of glucocorticoid, increased neutrophil count and LDH had a predictive role as indicators for IMV, and the use of glucocorticoid, increased neutrophil count and PCT had a predictive role as indicators for NIMV. The area under the curve (AUC) of use of glucocorticoid, increased neutrophil count and LDH was 0.885 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.838-0.933,

conclusionGlucocorticoid, increased neutrophil and LDH were predictive indicators for IMV, whereas glucocorticoid, increased neutrophil and PCT were predictive indicators for NIMV. In addition, the above-mentioned mediators had the most predictive meaning for mechanical ventilation when combined.

Indexed as

BetacoronavirusRespiration, ArtificialAgedCoronavirus InfectionsCOVID-19FemaleGlucocorticoidsHospitalizationHumansLogistic ModelsMaleMiddle AgedNeutrophilsPandemicsPneumonia, ViralRespiratory InsufficiencyGlucocorticoidscoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)mechanical ventilationpredictorssevere acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2)

Identifiers

PMID33054630
PMCPMC7570781
OpenAlexW3093299749

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.