Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33054558›Full record

ArticleJournal of primary care & community health

Examining Older Adults' Attitudes and Perceptions of Cancer Screening and Overscreening: A Qualitative Study.

Siddhartha Roy, Jennifer L Moss, Sol M Rodriguez-Colon, Chan Shen, Joie D Cooper, Robert P Lennon, Eugene J Lengerich, Alan Adelman, William Curry, Mack T Ruffin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of primary care & community health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Siddhartha RoyPenn State College of Medicine, Hershey, PA, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6420-1846
Jennifer L MossPenn State College of Medicine, Hershey, PA, USA.
Sol M Rodriguez-ColonPenn State College of Medicine, Hershey, PA, USA.
Chan ShenPenn State College of Medicine, Hershey, PA, USA.
Joie D CooperPenn State College of Medicine, Hershey, PA, USA.
Robert P LennonPenn State College of Medicine, Hershey, PA, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0973-5890
Eugene J LengerichPenn State College of Medicine, Hershey, PA, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9872-1647
Alan AdelmanPenn State College of Medicine, Hershey, PA, USA.
William CurryPenn State College of Medicine, Hershey, PA, USA.
Mack T RuffinPenn State College of Medicine, Hershey, PA, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

INTRODUCTION/

objectivesScreening guidelines for breast, cervical, and colorectal cancer (CRC) are less clear for older adults due to the potential harms that may result from screening. Understanding older adults' attitudes and perceptions, especially racial/ethnic minority and underserved adults, of cancer screening can help health care providers determine how best to communicate with older adults about cancer screening and screening cessation. The objective of this study was to determine how older adults primarily from minority/underserved backgrounds perceive cancer screening and overscreening.

methodsFour focus groups (n = 39) were conducted with adults (>=65 years of age) in 3 community settings in south-central Pennsylvania. Two focus groups were conducted in Spanish and translated to English upon transcription. Focus group data was managed and analyzed using QSR NVivo 12. Inductive thematic analysis was used to analyze the data where themes emerged following the coding process.

resultsThe focus group participants had an average age of 74 years and were primarily female (74%) and Hispanic (69%), with 69% reporting having less than a high school degree. Four key themes were identified from the focus groups: (1) importance of tailored and targeted education/information; (2) impact of physician/patient communication; (3) impact of barriers and facilitators to screening on cancer screening cessation; and (4) awareness of importance of screening. Participants were more likely to be agreeable to screening cessation if they received specific information regarding their health status and previous medical history from their physician as to why screening should be stopped and told by their physician that the screening decision is up to them.

conclusionsOlder adults prefer individualized information from their physician in order to justify screening cessation but are against incorporating life expectancy into the discussion. Future research should focus on developing interventions to test the effectiveness of culturally tailored screening cessation messages for older adults.

Indexed as

Early Detection of CancerNeoplasmsAgedAttitudeEthnicityFemaleFocus GroupsHumansMinority GroupsPennsylvaniaPerceptionQualitative Researchcancerminorityoverscreeningqualitativescreening

Identifiers

PMID33054558
PMCPMC7576932

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.