Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33054553›Full record

ArticleJournal of cognitive neuroscience2021

Current Promises and Limitations of Combined Virtual Reality and Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Research in Humans: A Commentary on Huffman and Ekstrom (2019).

Adam Steel, Caroline E Robertson, Jeffrey S Taube

Abstract readEditorialComment
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cognitive neuroscience, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Individual differences in navigation skill: towards reliable and valid measures.Cognitive research: principles and implications · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Changes in spatial self-consciousness elicit grid cell-like representation in the entorhinal cortex.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  8. How Do In-Car Navigation Aids Impair Expert Navigators' Spatial Learning Ability?Annals of the American Association of Geographers · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Adam SteelDartmouth College.
Caroline E RobertsonDartmouth College.
Jeffrey S TaubeDartmouth College.

Funding

Neural Basis for Spatial CognitionR01NS104193 · NINDS · DARTMOUTH COLLEGE · PI TAUBE, JEFFREY STEVEN · 2018 to 2021
$1.4M
NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS104193
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Real-world navigation requires movement of the body through space, producing a continuous stream of visual and self-motion signals, including proprioceptive, vestibular, and motor efference cues. These multimodal cues are integrated to form a spatial cognitive map, an abstract, amodal representation of the environment. How the brain combines these disparate inputs and the relative importance of these inputs to cognitive map formation and recall are key unresolved questions in cognitive neuroscience. Recent advances in virtual reality technology allow participants to experience body-based cues when virtually navigating, and thus it is now possible to consider these issues in new detail. Here, we discuss a recent publication that addresses some of these issues (D. J. Huffman and A. D. Ekstrom. A modality-independent network underlies the retrieval of large-scale spatial environments in the human brain.

Indexed as

Virtual RealityCuesHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMovementProprioception

Identifiers

PMID33054553
PMCPMC10284033

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.