ArticleJournal of the American Heart Association2020
Development and Internal Validation of a Model Predicting Premature Cardiovascular Disease Among Women With Hypertensive Disorders of Pregnancy: A Population-Based Study in Quebec, Canada.
Article in Journal of the American Heart Association, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- A Review of Traditional and Non-Traditional Cardiovascular Risk Factors in Women.International journal of women's health · 2026Review
- The value of pregnancy-related factors in the prediction of cardiovascular disease: a systematic review.International journal of cardiology. Cardiovascular risk and prevention · 2025Review
- Development and validation of a postpartum cardiovascular disease risk prediction model in women incorporating reproductive and pregnancy-related predictors.BMC medicine · 2025Article
- Development and internal validation of a model to predict type 2 diabetic complications after gestational diabetes.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Development and Internal Validation of a Model Predicting Premature Cardiovascular Disease Among Women With Hypertensive Disorders of Pregnancy: A Population-Based Study in Quebec, Canada.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Background Hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (HDP) are associated with an increased risk of premature cardiovascular disease (CVD), but existing cardiovascular prediction models do not adequately capture risks in young women. We developed a model to predict the 10-year risk of premature CVD and mortality among women who have HDP. Methods and Results Using a population-based cohort of women with HDP who delivered between April 1989 and March 2017 in Quebec, Canada, we developed a 10-year CVD risk model using Cox proportional hazards regression. Women aged 18 to 45 years were followed from their first HDP-complicated delivery until March 2018. We assessed performance of the model based on discrimination, calibration, and risk stratification ability. Internal validity was assessed using the bootstrap method. The cohort included 95 537 women who contributed 1 401 084 person-years follow-up. In total, 4024 (4.2%) of women were hospitalized for CVD, of which 1585 events (1.6%) occurred within 10 years of follow-up. The final model had modest discriminatory performance (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.65-0.67) and good calibration with slope of 0.95 and intercept of -0.19. There was moderate classification accuracy (likelihood ratio+: 5.90; 95% CI, 5.01-6.95) in the highest-risk group upon risk stratification. Conclusions Overall, our model had modest performance in predicting the 10-year risk of premature CVD for women with HDP. We recommend the addition of clinical variables, and external validation, before consideration for clinical use.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.