ReviewExpert opinion on emerging drugs2020
Emerging drugs for the treatment of scleroderma: a review of recent phase 2 and 3 trials.
Review in Expert opinion on emerging drugs, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Integrating palliative care principles into systemic sclerosis management.Rheumatology international · 2026Review
- Preventive effects of early immunosuppressive treatment on the development of interstitial lung disease in systemic sclerosis.Rheumatology (Oxford, England) · 2025Article
- A Phase II study of avenciguat, a novel soluble guanylate cyclase activator, in patients with systemic sclerosis: Study design and rationale of the VITALISScE™ study.Journal of scleroderma and related disorders · 2025Article
- Critical Analysis of Cytoplasmic Progression of Inflammatory Signaling Suggests Potential Pharmacologic Targets for Wound Healing and Fibrotic Disorders.Biomedicines · 2024Review
- Improving outcomes in scleroderma: recent progress of cell-based therapies.Rheumatology (Oxford, England) · 2023Review
- Therapeutic Approaches to Systemic Sclerosis: Recent Approvals and Future Candidate Therapies.Clinical reviews in allergy & immunology · 2023Review
- Clinical characteristics, visceral involvement, and mortality in at-risk or early diffuse systemic sclerosis: a longitudinal analysis of an observational prospective multicenter US cohort.Arthritis research & therapy · 2021Observational
- New promising drugs for the treatment of systemic sclerosis: pathogenic considerations, enhanced classifications, and personalized medicine.Expert opinion on investigational drugs · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
introductionSystemic sclerosis (SSc) has the highest case-specific mortality of all connective tissue diseases. Its underlying disease mechanism affects several organs and remains incompletely understood. Ongoing work clarifying its etiopathogenesis is helping to develop targeted therapy. AREAS COVERED: Several clinical trials have evaluated the safety and efficacy of agents targeting different mechanisms of this disease. This review article reviews those mechanisms and surveys four key recent phase II or III clinical trials that are contributing to the landscape of SSc therapy. The reported trials primarily focus on patients with systemic sclerosis in the early phase of disease. EXPERT OPINION: Traditional therapies for SSc center on immunosuppressive and cytotoxic agents. A new cadre of therapies is borne from improved understandings of SSc pathobiology and target the inflammatory-fibrotic pathways. Scleroderma trials have entered the initial phase of personalized medicine, recognizing molecular subsets that will improve upon cohort enrichment and maximize the measurable benefit of future therapies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.