Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33054183›Full record

ArticleJournal of chemical theory and computation2020

Comprehensive Assessment of GFN Tight-Binding and Composite Density Functional Theory Methods for Calculating Gas-Phase Infrared Spectra.

Philipp Pracht, David F Grant, Stefan Grimme

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of chemical theory and computation, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Transfer-Learning Deep Raman Models Using Semiempirical Quantum Chemistry.Journal of chemical information and modeling · 2025
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. AnAnalytical chemistry · 2023
    Article
  13. Best-Practice DFT Protocols for Basic Molecular Computational Chemistry.Angewandte Chemie (International ed. in English) · 2022
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Philipp PrachtMulliken Center for Theoretical Chemistry, Institute for Physical and Theoretical Chemistry, University of Bonn, Beringstrasse 4, 53115 Bonn, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8495-9504
David F GrantDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Connecticut, Storrs, Connecticut 06268, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3616-6689
Stefan GrimmeMulliken Center for Theoretical Chemistry, Institute for Physical and Theoretical Chemistry, University of Bonn, Beringstrasse 4, 53115 Bonn, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5844-4371

Funding

Metabolomics Tools for BiomedicineR01GM087714 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT STORRS · PI GRANT, DAVID FRANKLIN · 2010 to 2018
$3.1M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM087714
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Vibrational spectroscopy is a valuable and widely used analytical tool for the characterization of chemical substances. We investigate the performance of semiempirical quantum mechanical GFN tight-binding and force-field methods for the calculation of gas-phase infrared spectra in comparison to experiment and low-cost (B3LYP-3c) density functional theory. A data set of 7247 experimental references was used to evaluate method performance based on automatic spectra comparison. Various quantitative spectral similarity measures were employed for the comparison between theory and experiment and for determining empirical scaling factors. It is shown that the scaling of atomic masses provides an accurate yet simple alternative to standard global frequency scaling in density functional theory (DFT) and semiempirical calculations. Furthermore, the method performance for 58 exemplary transition metal complexes was investigated. The efficient DFT composite method B3LYP-3c, that was introduced in the course of this work, was found to be excellently suited for general IR spectra calculations. The GFN1- and GFN2-xTB tight-binding methods clearly outperformed the PMx competitors. Conformational changes were investigated for a subset of the data and are found to have a mediocre strong influence on the simulated spectra suggesting that the corresponding elaborate sampling steps may be neglected in automated compound identification workflows.

Identifiers

PMID33054183
PMCPMC8378236

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.