ArticleHaematologica2020
Quantitative PCR-based chimerism in bone marrow or peripheral blood to predict acute myeloid leukemia relapse in high-risk patients: results from the KIM-PB prospective study.
Article in Haematologica, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- Review
- Review
- Real-world clinical experience with NGS-based chimerism analyses in haematopoietic stem cell transplant patients.British journal of haematology · 2025Article
- Long-Term Donor Chimerism Monitoring for Relapse Risk Assessment After Pediatric Allo-HSCT.The application of clinical genetics · 2025Article
- Prospects and Potential for Chimerism Analysis after Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation.Cells · 2024Review
- Article
- Bone marrow CD34+ molecular chimerism as an early predictor of relapse after allogeneic stem cell transplantation in patients with acute myeloid leukemia.Frontiers in oncology · 2023Article
- A practical guide to chimerism analysis: Review of the literature and testing practices worldwide.Human immunology · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.