Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33053945›Full record

ReviewJournal of stroke2020

Optimizing Stem Cell Therapy after Ischemic Brain Injury.

Shuai Zhang, Brittany Bolduc Lachance, Bilal Moiz, Xiaofeng Jia

Open access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of stroke, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 48 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
48citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
8.0field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

48 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 93 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Intranasal administration of mesenchymal stem cells overexpressing FGF21 demonstrates therapeutic potential in experimental Parkinson's disease.Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics · 2025
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Stem Cell Therapy for Repair of the Injured Brain: Five Principles.The Neuroscientist : a review journal bringing neurobiology, neurology and psychiatry · 2024
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Shuai ZhangDepartment of Neurosurgery, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Brittany Bolduc LachanceProgram in Trauma, Department of Neurology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Bilal MoizDepartment of Neurosurgery, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Xiaofeng JiaDepartment of Neurosurgery, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
University of Maryland, Baltimore · USJohns Hopkins University · US

Funding

Brain Monitoring and Therapeutic Hypothermia after Cardiac ArrestR01HL118084 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE · PI JIA, XIAOFENG · 2013 to 2018
$1.9M
Brain Recovery after Cardiac Arrest with Metabolic Glycoengineered Stem CellsR01NS110387 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE · PI JIA, XIAOFENG · 2018 to 2022
$1.7M
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL118084NIH HHS R01HL118084NIH HHS R01NS110387NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS110387
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Stem cells have been used for regenerative and therapeutic purposes in a variety of diseases. In ischemic brain injury, preclinical studies have been promising, but have failed to translate results to clinical trials. We aimed to explore the application of stem cells after ischemic brain injury by focusing on topics such as delivery routes, regeneration efficacy, adverse effects, and in vivo potential optimization. PUBMED and Web of Science were searched for the latest studies examining stem cell therapy applications in ischemic brain injury, particularly after stroke or cardiac arrest, with a focus on studies addressing delivery optimization, stem cell type comparison, or translational aspects. Other studies providing further understanding or potential contributions to ischemic brain injury treatment were also included. Multiple stem cell types have been investigated in ischemic brain injury treatment, with a strong literature base in the treatment of stroke. Studies have suggested that stem cell administration after ischemic brain injury exerts paracrine effects via growth factor release, blood-brain barrier integrity protection, and allows for exosome release for ischemic injury mitigation. To date, limited studies have investigated these therapeutic mechanisms in the setting of cardiac arrest or therapeutic hypothermia. Several delivery modalities are available, each with limitations regarding invasiveness and safety outcomes. Intranasal delivery presents a potentially improved mechanism, and hypoxic conditioning offers a potential stem cell therapy optimization strategy for ischemic brain injury. The use of stem cells to treat ischemic brain injury in clinical trials is in its early phase; however, increasing preclinical evidence suggests that stem cells can contribute to the down-regulation of inflammatory phenotypes and regeneration following injury. The safety and the tolerability profile of stem cells have been confirmed, and their potent therapeutic effects make them powerful therapeutic agents for ischemic brain injury patients.

Indexed as

Brain ischemiaBrain regenerationCardiac arrestStem cellsStem cell transplantationStroke

Identifiers

PMID33053945
PMCPMC7568970
OpenAlexW3091535295

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.