Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33053429›Full record

ReviewNeurobiology of learning and memory2020

Midbrain circuits of novelty processing.

Andrew R Tapper, Susanna Molas

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Neurobiology of learning and memory, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 74 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Role of Dopamine Neurons in Familiarity.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2023
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Novelty seeking for novelty's sake.Nature neuroscience · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Andrew R TapperBrudnick Neuropsychiatric Research Institute, Dept. of Neurobiology, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, MA 01605, USA.
Susanna MolasBrudnick Neuropsychiatric Research Institute, Dept. of Neurobiology, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, MA 01605, USA. Electronic address: susanna.casacuberta@umassmed.edu.
University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School · US

Funding

The mesointerpeduncular circuit in anxiety and nicotine withdrawalR01DA041482 · NIDA · UNIV OF MASSACHUSETTS MED SCH WORCESTER · PI ANDREW R TAPPER · 2017 to 2026
$4.0M
The role of familiarity neurocircuitry in novelty seekingR01DA047678 · NIDA · UNIV OF MASSACHUSETTS MED SCH WORCESTER · PI TAPPER, ANDREW R · 2019 to 2023
$2.4M
NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA041482NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA047678
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Novelty triggers an increase in orienting behavior that is critical to evaluate the potential salience of unknown events. As novelty becomes familiar upon repeated encounters, this increase in response rapidly habituates as a form of behavioral adaptation underlying goal-directed behaviors. Many neurodevelopmental, psychiatric and neurodegenerative disorders are associated with abnormal responses to novelty and/or familiarity, although the neuronal circuits and cellular/molecular mechanisms underlying these natural behaviors in the healthy brain are largely unknown, as is the maladaptive processes that occur to induce impairment of novelty signaling in diseased brains. In rodents, the development of cutting-edge tools that allow for measurements of real time activity dynamics in selectively identified neuronal ensembles by gene expression signatures is beginning to provide advances in understanding the neural bases of the novelty response. Accumulating evidence indicate that midbrain circuits, the majority of which linked to dopamine transmission, promote exploratory assessments and guide approach/avoidance behaviors to different types of novelty via specific projection sites. The present review article focuses on midbrain circuit analysis relevant to novelty processing and habituation with familiarity.

Indexed as

AnimalsDopaminergic NeuronsExploratory BehaviorHabituation, PsychophysiologicHumansMesencephalonMiceNerve NetRaphe NucleiRatsRecognition, PsychologyDopamineMidbrainNeuronal circuitsNoveltySalience

Identifiers

PMID33053429
PMCPMC8091486
OpenAlexW3091774808

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.