Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33053037›Full record

SynthesisRevista Brasileira de terapia intensiva

Prevalence of burnout among intensive care physicians: a systematic review.

Filippo Sanfilippo, Gaetano Joseph Palumbo, Alberto Noto, Salvatore Pennisi, Mirko Mineri, Francesco Vasile, Veronica Dezio, Diana Busalacchi, Paolo Murabito, Marinella Astuto

Erratum issuedOpen access · greenAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Revista Brasileira de terapia intensiva. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Burnout Among Physicians of Specialties Dedicated to Liver Transplantation.Transplant international : official journal of the European Society for Organ Transplantation · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Prevalence, features and workplace factors associated with burnout among intensivists in Australia and New Zealand.Critical care and resuscitation : journal of the Australasian Academy of Critical Care Medicine · 2022
    Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

  • Erratum issued
    Erratum.Minieri, Mirko [corrected to Mineri, Mirko]
5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Filippo SanfilippoDepartment of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, A.O.U. "Policlinico-Vittorio Emanuele" - Catania, Itália.
Gaetano Joseph PalumboSchool of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, University Hospital "G. Rodolico", University of Catania - Catania, Itália.ORCID 0000-0002-5400-4723
Alberto NotoDepartment of Human Pathology of the Adult and Evolutive Age "Gaetano Barresi", Division of Anesthesia and Critical Care, University of Messina - Messina, Itália.
Salvatore PennisiSchool of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, University Hospital "G. Rodolico", University of Catania - Catania, Itália.
Mirko MineriSchool of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, University Hospital "G. Rodolico", University of Catania - Catania, Itália.
Francesco VasileSchool of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, University Hospital "G. Rodolico", University of Catania - Catania, Itália.
Veronica DezioSchool of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, University Hospital "G. Rodolico", University of Catania - Catania, Itália.
Diana BusalacchiSchool of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, University Hospital "G. Rodolico", University of Catania - Catania, Itália.
Paolo MurabitoDepartment of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, A.O.U. "Policlinico-Vittorio Emanuele" - Catania, Itália.
Marinella AstutoDepartment of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, A.O.U. "Policlinico-Vittorio Emanuele" - Catania, Itália.
University of Catania · ITAzienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Policlinico - Vittorio Emanuele · ITUniversity of Messina · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveWe performed a systematic review to summarize the knowledge regarding the prevalence of burnout among intensive care unit physicians.

methodsWe conducted a systematic review of the MEDLINE and PubMed® databases (last update 04.02.2019) with the goal of summarizing the evidence on burnout among intensive care unit physicians. We included all studies reporting burnout in intensive care unit personnel according to the Maslach Burnout Inventory questionnaire and then screened studies for data on burnout among intensive care unit physician specifically.

resultsWe found 31 studies describing burnout in intensive care unit staff and including different healthcare profiles. Among these, 5 studies focused on physicians only, and 12 others investigated burnout in mixed intensive care unit personnel but provided separate data on physicians. The prevalence of burnout varied greatly across studies (range 18% - 49%), but several methodological discrepancies, among them cut-off criteria for defining burnout and variability in the Likert scale, precluded a meaningful pooled analysis.

conclusionThe prevalence of burnout syndrome among intensive care unit physicians is relatively high, but significant methodological heterogeneities warrant caution being used in interpreting our results. The lower reported levels of burnout seem higher than those found in studies investigating mixed intensive care unit personnel. There is an urgent need for consensus recommending a consistent use of the Maslach Burnout Inventory test to screen burnout, in order to provide precise figures on burnout in intensive care unit physicians.

Indexed as

Intensive Care UnitsBurnout, ProfessionalHumansPhysiciansPrevalenceSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID33053037
PMCPMC7595726
OpenAlexW3091920580

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.