Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33052925›Full record

ArticlePloS one2020

Molecular investigations on a chimeric strain of Staphylococcus aureus sequence type 80.

Darius Gawlik, Antje Ruppelt-Lorz, Elke Müller, Annett Reißig, Helmut Hotzel, Sascha D Braun, Bo Söderquist, Albrecht Ziegler-Cordts, Claudia Stein, Mathias W Pletz and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
0.1field-weighted citation impact, top 44% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. The Pathogenicity Mechanisms ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Sequence Analysis of NovelInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Darius GawlikInstitute of Infectious Diseases and Infection Control, University Hospital, Jena, Germany.
Antje Ruppelt-LorzInstitute for Medical Microbiology and Hygiene, Technical University of Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
Elke MüllerLeibniz Institute of Photonic Technology (IPHT), Jena, Germany.
Annett ReißigLeibniz Institute of Photonic Technology (IPHT), Jena, Germany.
Helmut HotzelFriedrich-Loeffler-Institut, Institute of Bacterial Infections and Zoonoses, Jena, Germany.
Sascha D BraunLeibniz Institute of Photonic Technology (IPHT), Jena, Germany.
Bo SöderquistSchool of Medical Sciences, Department of Laboratory Medicine, Clinical Microbiology, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden.
Albrecht Ziegler-CordtsT-Systems Multimedia Solutions GmbH, Dresden, Germany.
Claudia SteinInstitute of Infectious Diseases and Infection Control, University Hospital, Jena, Germany.
Mathias W PletzInstitute of Infectious Diseases and Infection Control, University Hospital, Jena, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-8157-2753
Ralf EhrichtLeibniz Institute of Photonic Technology (IPHT), Jena, Germany.
Stefan MoneckeInstitute for Medical Microbiology and Hygiene, Technical University of Dresden, Dresden, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-4368-8709
Leibniz Institute of Photonic Technology · DEJena University Hospital · DEFriedrich-Loeffler-Institut · DEInstitute of Medical Microbiology and Hygiene · DEÖrebro University · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A PVL-positive, methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus was cultured from pus from cervical lymphadenitis of a patient of East-African origin. Microarray hybridisation assigned the isolate to clonal complex (CC) 80 but revealed unusual features, including the presence of the ORF-CM14 enterotoxin homologue and of an ACME-III element as well as the absence of etD and edinB. The isolate was subjected to both, Illumina and Nanopore sequencing allowing characterisation of deviating regions within the strain´s genome. Atypical features of this strain were attributable to the presence of two genomic regions that originated from other S. aureus lineages and that comprised, respectively, 3% and 1.4% of the genome. One deviating region extended from walJ to sirB. It comprised ORF-CM14 and the ACME-III element. A homologous but larger fragment was also found in an atypical S. aureus CC1/ST567 strain whose lineage might have served as donor of this genomic region. This region itself is a chimera comprising fragments from CC1 as well as fragments of unknown origin. The other deviating region comprised the region from htsB to ecfA2, i.e., another 3% of the genome. It was very similar to CC1 sequences. Either this suggests an incorporation of CC1 DNA into the study strain, or alternatively a recombination event affecting "canonical" CC80. Thus, the study strain bears witness of several recombination events affecting supposedly core genomic genes. Although the exact mechanism is not yet clear, such chimerism seems to be an additional pathway in the evolution of S. aureus. This could facilitate also a transmission of virulence and resistance factors and therefore offer an additional evolutionary advantage.

Indexed as

Bacterial ProteinsChimeraEvolution, MolecularFemaleHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHumansLymphadenitisMiddle AgedMutagenesis, InsertionalOligonucleotide Array Sequence AnalysisRecombination, GeneticSequence Analysis, DNAStaphylococcal InfectionsStaphylococcus aureusSuppurationBacterial Proteins

Identifiers

PMID33052925
PMCPMC7556507
OpenAlexW3093079021

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.