ArticlePloS one2020
Analyzing the fine structure of distributions.
Article in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- Self-explaining artificial intelligence for the classification of B cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma: A diagnostic decision support study.PLoS medicine · 2026Article
- Evaluating the impact of South-North Joint Malaria Control Project on spatiotemporal transmission dynamics in South Korea using dynamic mode decomposition.Malaria journal · 2026Article
- Article
- m1A-Ensem: accurate identification of 1-methyladenosine sites through ensemble models.BioData mining · 2024Article
- Development of an explainable AI system using routine clinical parameters for rapid differentiation of inflammatory conditions.Frontiers in immunology · 2024Article
- Multi-omics characteristics of tumor-associated macrophages in the tumor microenvironment of gastric cancer and their exploration of immunotherapy potential.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Testing Thermostatic Bath End-Scale Stability for Calibration Performance with a Multiple-Sensor Ensemble Using ARIMA, Temporal Stochastics and a Quantum Walker Algorithm.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Prediction of Clinical Outcomes with Explainable Artificial Intelligence in Patients with Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2023Article
- DDCAL: Evenly Distributing Data into Low Variance Clusters Based on Iterative Feature Scaling.Journal of classification · 2023Article
- A Bioinformatics View on Acute Myeloid Leukemia Surface Molecules by Combined Bayesian and ABC Analysis.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- How well do practicing radiologists interpret the results of CAD technology? A quantitative characterization.Cognitive research: principles and implications · 2022Article
- Comment on Ammonia level as a proxy of asparaginase inactivation in children: A strategy for classification of infusion reactions.Journal of oncology pharmacy practice : official publication of the International Society of Oncology Pharmacy Practitioners · 2021Article
- Best Graph Type to Compare Discrete Groups: Bar, Dot, and Tally.Frontiers in psychology · 2021Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
One aim of data mining is the identification of interesting structures in data. For better analytical results, the basic properties of an empirical distribution, such as skewness and eventual clipping, i.e. hard limits in value ranges, need to be assessed. Of particular interest is the question of whether the data originate from one process or contain subsets related to different states of the data producing process. Data visualization tools should deliver a clear picture of the univariate probability density distribution (PDF) for each feature. Visualization tools for PDFs typically use kernel density estimates and include both the classical histogram, as well as the modern tools like ridgeline plots, bean plots and violin plots. If density estimation parameters remain in a default setting, conventional methods pose several problems when visualizing the PDF of uniform, multimodal, skewed distributions and distributions with clipped data, For that reason, a new visualization tool called the mirrored density plot (MD plot), which is specifically designed to discover interesting structures in continuous features, is proposed. The MD plot does not require adjusting any parameters of density estimation, which is what may make the use of this plot compelling particularly to non-experts. The visualization tools in question are evaluated against statistical tests with regard to typical challenges of explorative distribution analysis. The results of the evaluation are presented using bimodal Gaussian, skewed distributions and several features with already published PDFs. In an exploratory data analysis of 12 features describing quarterly financial statements, when statistical testing poses a great difficulty, only the MD plots can identify the structure of their PDFs. In sum, the MD plot outperforms the above mentioned methods.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.