ArticlePloS one2020
Power-law population heterogeneity governs epidemic waves.
Article in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed.
- Uncertainty and inconsistency of COVID-19 non-pharmaceutical intervention effects with multiple competitive statistical models.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Strength and weakness of disease-induced herd immunity in networks.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025Article
- Impact of imported COVID-19 cases on South Korea's response: variant transitions and regional patterns (2020-2023).BMC infectious diseases · 2025Article
- The spread of infectious diseases from a physics perspective.Biology methods & protocols · 2023Article
- Policies on children and schools during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic in Western Europe.Frontiers in public health · 2023Review
- Mathematical Models Supporting Control of COVID-19.China CDC weekly · 2022Article
- A high-resolution flux-matrix model describes the spread of diseases in a spatial network and the effect of mitigation strategies.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Individual risk-aversion responses tune epidemics to critical transmissibility (Royal Society open science · 2022Article
- Contagious statistical distributions: k-connections and applications in infectious disease environments.PloS one · 2022Article
- Stochastic social behavior coupled to COVID-19 dynamics leads to waves, plateaus, and an endemic state.eLife · 2021Article
- Modelling strategies to organize healthcare workforce during pandemics: Application to COVID-19.Journal of theoretical biology · 2021Article
- Socio-demographic and health factors drive the epidemic progression and should guide vaccination strategies for best COVID-19 containment.Results in physics · 2021Article
- Initial growth rates of malware epidemics fail to predict their reach.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- Time-dependent heterogeneity leads to transient suppression of the COVID-19 epidemic, not herd immunity.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021Review
- Rapid review of COVID-19 epidemic estimation studies for Iran.BMC public health · 2021Review
- Heterogeneity matters: Contact structure and individual variation shape epidemic dynamics.PloS one · 2021Article
- A simple, SIR-like but individual-based epidemic model: Application in comparison of COVID-19 in New York City and Wuhan.Results in physics · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We generalize the Susceptible-Infected-Removed (SIR) model for epidemics to take into account generic effects of heterogeneity in the degree of susceptibility to infection in the population. We introduce a single new parameter corresponding to a power-law exponent of the susceptibility distribution at small susceptibilities. We find that for this class of distributions the gamma distribution is the attractor of the dynamics. This allows us to identify generic effects of population heterogeneity in a model as simple as the original SIR model which is contained as a limiting case. Because of this simplicity, numerical solutions can be generated easily and key properties of the epidemic wave can still be obtained exactly. In particular, we present exact expressions for the herd immunity level, the final size of the epidemic, as well as for the shape of the wave and for observables that can be quantified during an epidemic. In strongly heterogeneous populations, the herd immunity level can be much lower than in models with homogeneous populations as commonly used for example to discuss effects of mitigation. Using our model to analyze data for the SARS-CoV-2 epidemic in Germany shows that the reported time course is consistent with several scenarios characterized by different levels of immunity. These scenarios differ in population heterogeneity and in the time course of the infection rate, for example due to mitigation efforts or seasonality. Our analysis reveals that quantifying the effects of mitigation requires knowledge on the degree of heterogeneity in the population. Our work shows that key effects of population heterogeneity can be captured without increasing the complexity of the model. We show that information about population heterogeneity will be key to understand how far an epidemic has progressed and what can be expected for its future course.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.