Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33052840›Full record

ReviewTurkish journal of urology2021

Ablative options for prostate cancer management.

Rafael R Tourinho-Barbosa, Lucas Teixeira Batista, Xavier Cathelineau, Javier Sanchez-Macias, Rafael Sanchez-Salas

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Turkish journal of urology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 38% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Tissue Ablation: Applications and Perspectives.Advanced materials (Deerfield Beach, Fla.) · 2024
    Review
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Rafael R Tourinho-BarbosaDepartment of Urology, Institute Mutualiste Montsouris, Université Paris-Descartes, Paris, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9826-2890
Lucas Teixeira BatistaDepartment of Urology, Hospital Cardiopulmonar, Salvador, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1818-6136
Xavier CathelineauDepartment of Urology, Institute Mutualiste Montsouris, Université Paris-Descartes, Paris, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3928-1543
Javier Sanchez-MaciasDepartment of Urology, Hospital Clinic de Barcelona, Universidad de Barcelona, Barcelone, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3085-829X
Rafael Sanchez-SalasDepartment of Urology, Institute Mutualiste Montsouris, Université Paris-Descartes, Paris, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2407-4760
Université Paris Cité · FRHospital Clínic de Barcelona · ESHospital São Rafael · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This review provides an overview of the available ablative options for prostate cancer (PCa) management. It contemplates the ablative concepts and the role of prostate ablation in different settings, from primary treatment to repeat ablation, and as an alternative to radiorecurrent disease. Improvements in prostate imaging have allowed us to ablate prostate lesions through thermal, mechanical, and vascular-targeted sources of energy. Partial gland ablation (PGA) has an emerging role in the management of localized PCa because toxicity outcomes have been proven less harmful compared with whole-gland treatments. Although long-term oncological outcomes are yet to be consolidated in comparative studies, recent large series and prospective studies in PGA have reported encouraging results. A second ablation after disease recurrence has demonstrated low toxicity, and future studies must define its potential to avoid radical treatments. PGA is an attractive option for PCa management in different scenarios because of its low-toxicity profile. As expected, recurrence rates are higher than those seen in whole-gland procedures. Long-term oncological outcomes of primary and salvage options are required to endorse it among the standard treatments.

Identifiers

PMID33052840
PMCPMC8057362
OpenAlexW3091846863

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.