Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33052821›Full record

Observational studyThe western journal of emergency medicine2020

Underutilization of the Emergency Department During the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Anthony D Lucero, Andre Lee, Jenny Hyun, Carol Lee, Chadi Kahwaji, Gregg Miller, Michael Neeki, Joshua Tamayo-Sarver, Luhong Pan

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in The western journal of emergency medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 46 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
46citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

46 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Observational
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Observational
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Anthony D LuceroKaweah Delta Medical Center, Department of Emergency Medicine, Visalia, California.
Andre LeeKaweah Delta Medical Center, Department of Emergency Medicine, Visalia, California.
Jenny HyunVituity, Department of Enterprise Data Analytics, Emeryville, California.
Carol LeeArrowhead Regional Medical Center, Department of Emergency Medicine, Colton, California.
Chadi KahwajiKaweah Delta Medical Center, Department of Emergency Medicine, Visalia, California.
Gregg MillerSwedish Edmonds Campus, Department of Emergency Medicine, Edmonds, Washington.
Michael NeekiArrowhead Regional Medical Center, Department of Emergency Medicine, Colton, California.
Joshua Tamayo-SarverGood Samaritan Hospital, Department of Emergency Medicine, San Jose, California.
Luhong PanVituity, Department of Enterprise Data Analytics, Emeryville, California.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe novel coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic in the United States (US) prompted widespread containment measures such as shelter-in-place (SIP) orders. The goal of our study was to determine whether there was a significant change in overall volume and proportion of emergency department (ED) encounters since SIP measures began.

methodsThis was a retrospective, observational, cross-sectional study using billing data from January 1, 2017-April 20, 2020. We received data from 141 EDs across 16 states, encompassing a convenience sample of 26,223,438 ED encounters. We used a generalized least squares regression approach to ascertain changes for overall ED encounters, hospital admissions, and New York University ED visit algorithm categories.

resultsED encounters decreased significantly in the post-SIP period. Overall, there was a 39.6% decrease in ED encounters compared to expected volume in the pre-SIP period. Emergent encounters decreased by 35.8%, while non-emergent encounters decreased by 52.1%. Psychiatric encounters decreased by 30.2%. Encounters related to drugs and alcohol decreased the least, by 9.3% and 27.5%, respectively.

conclusionThere was a significant overall reduction in ED utilization in the post-SIP period. There was a greater reduction in lower acuity encounters than higher acuity encounters. Of all subtypes of ED encounters, substance abuse- and alcohol-related encounters reduced the least, and injury-related encounters reduced the most.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAge DistributionChildChild, PreschoolCOVID-19Cross-Sectional StudiesEmergency Service, HospitalFemaleHumansInfantMaleMiddle AgedQuarantineRetrospective Studies

Identifiers

PMID33052821
PMCPMC7673895

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.