Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33052528›Full record

ArticleSurgical endoscopy2021

Nerve-sparing laparoscopic disc excision of deep endometriosis involving the bowel: a single-center experience on 371 consecutives cases.

Marcello Ceccaroni, Matteo Ceccarello, Roberto Clarizia, Enrico Fusco, Giovanni Roviglione, Daniele Mautone, Camilla Cavallero, Simone Orlandi, Roberto Rossini, Giuliano Barugola and 1 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Surgical endoscopy, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Marcello CeccaroniDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Gynecologic Oncology and Minimally Invasive Pelvic Surgery, International School of Surgical Anatomy, IRCCS "Sacro Cuore-Don Calabria" Hospital, Via Don A. Sempreboni 5, 37024, Negrar di Valpolicella, Verona, Italy.
Matteo CeccarelloDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Gynecologic Oncology and Minimally Invasive Pelvic Surgery, International School of Surgical Anatomy, IRCCS "Sacro Cuore-Don Calabria" Hospital, Via Don A. Sempreboni 5, 37024, Negrar di Valpolicella, Verona, Italy. matteo.ceccarello@sacrocuore.it.
Roberto ClariziaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Gynecologic Oncology and Minimally Invasive Pelvic Surgery, International School of Surgical Anatomy, IRCCS "Sacro Cuore-Don Calabria" Hospital, Via Don A. Sempreboni 5, 37024, Negrar di Valpolicella, Verona, Italy.
Enrico FuscoDepartment of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Institute of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Foggia, Foggia, Italy.
Giovanni RoviglioneDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Gynecologic Oncology and Minimally Invasive Pelvic Surgery, International School of Surgical Anatomy, IRCCS "Sacro Cuore-Don Calabria" Hospital, Via Don A. Sempreboni 5, 37024, Negrar di Valpolicella, Verona, Italy.
Daniele MautoneDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Gynecologic Oncology and Minimally Invasive Pelvic Surgery, International School of Surgical Anatomy, IRCCS "Sacro Cuore-Don Calabria" Hospital, Via Don A. Sempreboni 5, 37024, Negrar di Valpolicella, Verona, Italy.
Camilla CavalleroDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Gynecologic Oncology and Minimally Invasive Pelvic Surgery, International School of Surgical Anatomy, IRCCS "Sacro Cuore-Don Calabria" Hospital, Via Don A. Sempreboni 5, 37024, Negrar di Valpolicella, Verona, Italy.
Simone OrlandiDepartment of Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy, IRCSS "Sacro Cuore-Don Calabria" Hospital, Negrar di Valpolicella, Verona, Italy.
Roberto RossiniDepartment of General Surgery, IRCSS "Sacro Cuore-Don Calabria" Hospital, Negrar di Valpolicella, Verona, Italy.
Giuliano BarugolaDepartment of General Surgery, IRCSS "Sacro Cuore-Don Calabria" Hospital, Negrar di Valpolicella, Verona, Italy.
Giacomo RuffoDepartment of General Surgery, IRCSS "Sacro Cuore-Don Calabria" Hospital, Negrar di Valpolicella, Verona, Italy.
Ospedale Sacro Cuore Don Calabria · ITIstituti di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico · ITUniversity of Foggia · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBowel endometriosis is the most common pattern of Deep Endometriosis (DE). Arising from the posterior portion of the cervix and spreading to the recto-vaginal septum, utero-sacral and parametrial ligaments could lead to a distortion of normal pelvic anatomy, causing pain and infertility. Hormonal therapy is the first-line treatment in non-symptomatic patient. Conversely, laparoscopic surgical treatment has to be considered when symptoms relief are not optimal or with signs of bowel occlusion.

methodsRetrospective experience of consecutive series of patients who referred to a third-level referral center with suspected bowel DE and failure of multiple medical treatments. After an intraoperative evaluation of nodule size with a rectal shaving of its external portion, patients underwent radical DE eradication with concomitant disc excision in rectal nodules < 3 cm with no signs of substantial full-thickness infiltration.

resultsA total of 371 patients were considered eligible for analysis, with a median age of 37 years. The median operative time of was 180 min, with an estimated blood loss of 100 mL and a median diameter of removed rectal nodule of 25 mm. Early postoperative procedure-related complications were 47 cases of acute rectal bleeding (12.7%), that were managed by rectal endoscopy, 3 bowel anastomotic dehiscence (0.8%), 8 hemoperitoneum (2.2%) and 3 ureteral fistula (0.8%). 22 patients experienced postoperative hyperpyrexia (5.9%), while 17 women underwent transient bladder deficiency (4.6%). Median follow-up was 60 months with a bowel recurrence rate of 2.2%. There was an improvement of all symptoms in the immediate postoperative follow-up (p < 0.0001). Among all patients with childbearing desire, the pregnancy rate found was 42.2% and was obtained by in vitro fertilization (IVF) techniques in 32% of cases.

conclusionsLaparoscopic disc excision for bowel endometriosis is an effective surgical treatment in selected residual rectal nodules < 3.0 cm. The concomitant radical DE excision contributes to a significant improvement of symptoms with an acceptable complications' rate.

Indexed as

Digestive System Surgical ProceduresEndometriosisLaparoscopyRectal DiseasesAdultFemaleHumansPostoperative ComplicationsPregnancyRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeBowel endometriosisColorectal endometriosisDeep endometriosisDisc excisionNerve-sparing surgeryRectal resection

Identifiers

PMID33052528
OpenAlexW3092404944

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.