Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33052466›Full record

ArticleEuropean radiology2021

A preliminary investigation of radiomics differences between ruptured and unruptured intracranial aneurysms.

Chubin Ou, Winston Chong, Chuan-Zhi Duan, Xin Zhang, Michael Morgan, Yi Qian

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European radiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed, 7 pooled it
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 46 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Systematic Review of Radiomics and Artificial Intelligence in Intracranial Aneurysm Management.Journal of neuroimaging : official journal of the American Society of Neuroimaging
    Pooled it
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Chubin OuFaculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Winston ChongMonash Medical Centre, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia.
Chuan-Zhi DuanNational Key Clinical Specialty/Engineering Technology Research Center of Education Ministry of China, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory on Brain Function Repair and Regeneration, Neurosurgery Institute, Department of Neurosurgery, Zhujiang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Xin ZhangNational Key Clinical Specialty/Engineering Technology Research Center of Education Ministry of China, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory on Brain Function Repair and Regeneration, Neurosurgery Institute, Department of Neurosurgery, Zhujiang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Michael MorganFaculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Yi QianFaculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia. yi.qian@mq.edu.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6452-3300
Zhujiang Hospital · CNMacquarie University · AUMonash Medical Centre · AU

Funding

National Health and Medical Research Council APP1157566
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesPrediction of intracranial aneurysm rupture is important in the management of unruptured aneurysms. The application of radiomics in predicting aneurysm rupture remained largely unexplored. This study aims to evaluate the radiomics differences between ruptured and unruptured aneurysms and explore its potential use in predicting aneurysm rupture.

methodsOne hundred twenty-two aneurysms were included in the study (93 unruptured). Morphological and radiomics features were extracted for each case. Statistical analysis was performed to identify significant features which were incorporated into prediction models constructed with a machine learning algorithm. To investigate the usefulness of radiomics features, three models were constructed and compared. The baseline model A was constructed with morphological features, while model B was constructed with addition of radiomics shape features and model C with more radiomics features. Multivariate analysis was performed for the ten most important variables in model C to identify independent risk factors. A simplified model based on independent risk factors was constructed for clinical use.

resultsFive morphological features and 89 radiomics features were significantly associated with rupture. Model A, model B, and model C achieved the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.767, 0.807, and 0.879, respectively. Model C was significantly better than model A and model B (p < 0.001). Multivariate analysis identified two radiomics features which were used to construct the simplified model showing an AUROC of 0.876.

conclusionsRadiomics signatures were different between ruptured and unruptured aneurysms. The use of radiomics features, especially texture features, may significantly improve rupture prediction performance. KEY POINTS: • Significant radiomics differences exist between ruptured and unruptured intracranial aneurysms. • Radiomics shape features can significantly improve rupture prediction performance over conventional morphology-based prediction model. The inclusion of histogram and texture radiomics features can further improve the performance. • A simplified model with two variables achieved a similar level of performance as the more complex ones. Our prediction model can serve as a promising tool for the risk management of intracranial aneurysms.

Indexed as

Aneurysm, RupturedIntracranial AneurysmCerebral AngiographyHumansRisk FactorsROC CurveIntracranial aneurysmMachine learningRadiomicsRuptureStroke

Identifiers

PMID33052466
OpenAlexW3092342649

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.