ArticleJAMA surgery2020
Long-term Oncologic Outcomes of Immediate Breast Reconstruction vs Conventional Mastectomy Alone for Breast Cancer in the Setting of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy.
Article in JAMA surgery, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
33 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 57 citations in OpenAlex.
- The Japanese Breast Cancer Society Clinical Practice Guidelines for surgical treatment of breast cancer, 2022 edition.Breast cancer (Tokyo, Japan) · 2024Guideline
- Oncological safety of nipple-sparing mastectomy after neoadjuvant chemotherapy: a systematic review.Revista do Colegio Brasileiro de Cirurgioes · 2023Pooled it
- Curative effect of immediate reconstruction after neoadjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in oncology · 2023Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Roles of ursodeoxycholic acid in the bile biochemistry and metabolomics in patients with choledocholithiasis: a prospective study.Metabolomics : Official journal of the Metabolomic Society · 2022Trial
- What are the determinants of type of breast surgery following neoadjuvant chemotherapy? An analysis of breast cancer patients among Italian SENONET centers: NEOIMPACT study.Breast (Edinburgh, Scotland) · 2026Observational
- Impact of breast reconstruction and different surgical approaches after neoadjuvant therapy on the long-term survival of breast cancer patients.Translational oncology · 2026Article
- The Use of Neoadjuvant Systemic Therapy to Facilitate Nipple-sparing Mastectomy and Immediate Reconstruction.Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open · 2026Article
- Article
- Survival comparison of breast conserving therapy and mastectomy with breast reconstruction for breast cancer using propensity score matched cohort.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Comparison of nipple sparing and skin sparing mastectomy with immediate reconstruction based on patient reported outcomes.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Evaluation of safety and operative time in tumescent-free robotic nipple-sparing mastectomy: a retrospective single-center cohort study.Annals of surgical treatment and research · 2024Article
- Impact of neoadjuvant chemotherapy on the safety and long-term outcomes of patients undergoing immediate breast reconstruction after mastectomy.Breast cancer (Tokyo, Japan) · 2024Article
- Primary adipocytes as targetable drug depot to prevent post-surgical cancer recurrence.Materials today. Bio · 2024Article
- Impact of unilateral mastectomy on body posture: A prospective longitudinal observational study.Asia-Pacific journal of oncology nursing · 2024Article
- Oncologic Outcomes of Immediate Breast Reconstruction in the Setting of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy: A Long-term Follow-up Study of a Matched Cohort.Journal of breast cancer · 2024Article
- Surgery paradigm for locally advanced breast cancer following neoadjuvant systemic therapy.Frontiers in surgery · 2024Review
- Prognosis of post-neoadjuvant therapy patients who underwent immediate breast reconstruction: a SEER-based, propensity-matched study.Breast cancer (Tokyo, Japan) · 2023Article
- Oncologic Outcomes in Nipple-sparing Mastectomy with Immediate Reconstruction and Total Mastectomy with Immediate Reconstruction in Women with Breast Cancer: A Machine-Learning Analysis.Annals of surgical oncology · 2023Article
- Oncologic outcome of breast reconstruction after mastectomy in breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Translational cancer research · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
14 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Importance: An increasing number of patients with breast cancer receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) undergo immediate breast reconstruction (IBR) with nipple-sparing mastectomy (NSM) or skin-sparing mastectomy (SSM) as surgical treatment. However, the oncologic efficacy and safety of this treatment sequencing strategy is unclear. Objective: To compare the long-term oncologic outcomes of IBR with NSM/SSM and conventional mastectomy (CM) alone for breast cancer in the NACT setting. Design, Setting, and Participants: A retrospective, propensity score-matched case-control study was conducted at Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Korea. A total of 1266 patients with breast cancer who underwent NACT followed by mastectomy with or without breast reconstruction between January 1, 2010, and November 30, 2016, were included. Data analysis was performed from July 1, 2019, to January 24, 2020. After propensity score matching, 323 patients who underwent IBR with NSM/SSM and 323 who underwent CM alone were selected for comparison of long-term oncologic outcomes. Main Outcomes and Measures: The 5-year local recurrence-free survival, disease-free survival, distant metastasis-free survival, and overall survival rates were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared using log-rank tests. Hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% CIs were estimated using the Cox proportional hazards regression model. Results: After matching, the median follow-up periods were 67 (range, 17-125) months for the IBR group and 68 (range, 17-126) months for the CM-alone group. Median age of the women in the IBR group was 42 (range, 23-72) years; median age of those in the CM-alone group was 46 (range, 30-75) years. No significant differences were observed between the IBR and CM-alone groups in local recurrence (3.7% vs 3.4%; P = .83), regional recurrence (7.1% vs 5.3%; P = .33), or distant metastasis (17.3% vs 18.6%; P = .68) rates. There was also no significant difference between the IBR and CM-alone groups in 5-year local recurrence-free survival (95.6% vs 96.7%; HR, 1.124; 95% CI, 0.495-2.549; P = .78), disease-free survival (76.5% vs 79.9%; HR, 1.089; 95% CI, 0.790-1.500; P = .60), distant metastasis-free survival (82.5% vs 82.5%; HR, 0.941; 95% CI, 0.654-1.355; P = .74), or overall survival (92.0% vs 89.3%; HR, 0.847; 95% CI, 0.530-1.353; P = .49) rates. Conclusions and Relevance: The long-term oncologic outcomes of IBR with NSM/SSM for breast cancer in this study appeared to be comparable to those of CM alone after NACT, suggesting the feasibility of IBR with NSM/SSM in the NACT setting.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.