ArticleJournal of vision2020
Pupillary response to representations of light in paintings.
Article in Journal of vision, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed.
- Pupillometric evidence for perceptual simulation in language comprehension: Sensory and emotional meanings of Japanese adjectives.Perception · 2026Article
- Eye metrics often reflect visual conscious awareness, conscious content, and neural processing in cerebral blindness.Communications biology · 2025Article
- Dimensionality reduction techniques in pupillometry research: A primer for behavioral scientists.Behavior research methods · 2025Article
- Uncovering Distinct Drivers of Covert Attention in Complex Environments With Pupillometry.Psychophysiology · 2025Article
- Art-induced psychological well-being: Individual traits shape the beneficial effects of aesthetic experiences.PloS one · 2025Article
- Pupil adjustments to illusory perceptions of the light intensity of object surfaces.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2025Article
- Assessing perceptual chromatic equiluminance using a reflexive pupillary response.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Effectiveness of labels in digital art experience: psychophysiological and behavioral evidence.Frontiers in psychology · 2024Article
- Pupil dilation response elicited by violations of auditory regularities is a promising but challenging approach to probe consciousness at the bedside.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Brightness Perception in World-Centered Coordinates Assessed by Pupillometry.Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Psychophysiological and behavioral responses to descriptive labels in modern art museums.PloS one · 2023Article
- Individual pupil size changes as a robust indicator of cognitive familiarity differences.PloS one · 2022Article
- Contextual Information Modulates Pupil Size in Autistic Children.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2022Article
- Enlargement of female pupils when perceiving something cute.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- The Certainty of Ambiguity in Visual Neural Representations.Annual review of vision science · 2021Review
- "Blue Sky Effect": Contextual Influences on Pupil Size During Naturalistic Visual Search.Frontiers in psychology · 2021Article
- Article
- Pupillary response to real, illusory, and implied motion.PloS one · 2021Article
- Catching Mind Wandering With Pupillometry: Conceptual and Methodological Challenges.Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Cognitive scienceReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
It is known that, although the level of light is the primary determinant of pupil size, cognitive factors can also affect pupil diameter. It has been demonstrated that photographs of the sun produce pupil constriction independently of their luminance and other low-level features, suggesting that high-level visual processing may also modulate pupil response. Here, we measure pupil response to artistic paintings of the sun, moon, or containing a uniform lighting, that, being mediated by the artist's interpretation of reality and his technical rendering, require an even higher level of interpretation compared with photographs. We also study how chromatic content and spatial layout affect the results by presenting grey-scale and inverted versions of each painting. Finally, we assess directly with a categorization test how subjective image interpretation affects pupil response. We find that paintings with the sun elicit a smaller pupil size than paintings with the moon, or paintings containing no visible light source. The effect produced by sun paintings is reduced by disrupting contextual information, such as by removing color or manipulating the relations between paintings features that make more difficult to identify the source of light. Finally, and more importantly, pupil diameter changes according to observers' interpretation of the scene represented in the same stimulus. In conclusion, results show that the subcortical pupillary response to light is modulated by subjective interpretation of luminous objects, suggesting the involvement of cortical systems in charge of cognitive processes, such as attention, object recognition, familiarity, memory, and imagination.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.