Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33052297›Full record

ArticleCureus2020

Can Pitch Mismatch Be Diagnosed in Children Who Use Electric-Acoustic Stimulation?

Vahid Moradi, Saeid Farahani, Farzaneh Fatahi, Saleh Mohebbi, Hessam Emamdjomeh

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Vahid MoradiDepartment of Audiology, School of Rehabilitation Sciences, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, IRN.
Saeid FarahaniDepartment of Audiology, School of Rehabilitation Sciences, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, IRN.
Farzaneh FatahiDepartment of Audiology, School of Rehabilitation Sciences, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, IRN.
Saleh MohebbiSkull Base Research Center, the Five Senses Institute, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, IRN.
Hessam EmamdjomehENT and Head & Neck Research Center, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, IRN.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction Pitch mismatch is one of the most important problems of users of bimodal cochlear implants, which affects their life satisfaction. Children with acquired hearing loss cannot explain their pitch mismatch problems, as they have had no auditory experience. This study tries to diagnose pitch mismatch in these children through the sound-induced flash illusion test. Materials and methods In this study, 20 children with a bimodal cochlear implant and 20 children with normal hearing, within the age range of 8 to 13 years old, were examined using the sound-induced flash illusion test. In this test, participants received one flash with one to four beep sounds, and they were asked to indicate the number of perceived flashes. Results The results revealed that in the bimodal implantation group, when the flash was provided with one beep, at certain frequencies, children expressed that they saw two flashes. However, the results were not the same in children with normal hearing. Conclusion The results indicated that at frequencies where the auditory information of the hearing aids and those of the cochlear implants overlap, pitch mismatch develops, which can significantly affect the auditory performance of bimodal users.

Indexed as

bimodal cochlear implantpitch mismatchsound induced flash illusion

Identifiers

PMID33052297
PMCPMC7546602

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.