ArticleCureus2020
Cardio-Protective Effects of Multiport Antegrade Cold Blood Cardioplegia Versus Antegrade Cold Blood Cardioplegia in Patients With Left Ventricular Systolic Dysfunction Undergoing Conventional Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting.
Article in Cureus, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Selective Vein Graft Cold Cardioplegia and Warm Reperfusion to Enhance Early Recovery in Patients with Left Ventricle Depression Undergoing Coronary Artery Surgery.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction The aim of this study was to compare the in-hospital outcomes of multiport antegrade cold blood cardioplegia through vein grafts versus conventional antegrade cold blood cardioplegia in patients with left ventricle systolic dysfunction who underwent coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). Methods This prospective, randomized clinical study was comprised of patients undergoing on-pump CABG at the Ch. Pervaiz Elahi Institute of Cardiology in Multan, Pakistan from November 18, 2018 to December 17, 2019. Patients with multivessel coronary artery disease and left ventricular systolic dysfunction (ejection fraction < 50%) were included. In Group A (N = 73), multiport antegrade cold blood vein graft cardioplegia was given after every distal anastomosis completed for myocardial preservation. In Group B (N = 73), conventional antegrade cold blood cardioplegia was given for myocardial preservation. Results Spontaneous rhythm (without defibrillation applied) after cross-clamp removal was higher in Group A than in Group B (93.3% vs. 85.2%, p < 0.05). Duration of support, ventilation time, and hospital stay were also significantly lower in Group A than in Group B with p = 0.00001, p = 0.03, and p = 0.002, respectively. Intra-aortic balloon pump insertion (4.1% vs. 23.0%, p = 0.02) and operative mortality (0.5% vs. 4.0%, p = 0.35) were also lower in Group A than in Group B. Postoperative left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) increased more in Group A than in Group B, and the postoperative LVEF mean value was 44.68% in Group A versus 41.26% in Group B (p = 0.02). Conclusion Multiport vein graft blood cardioplegia provides superior myocardial protection in patients with left ventricular systolic dysfunction who underwent CABG. It is also easy to administer, so this technique can be adopted as a routine method for myocardial protection in patients with left ventricular dysfunction planned for on-pump CABG.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.