ArticleProceedings of SPIE--the International Society for Optical Engineering2020
4D image construction from free-breathing MRI slice acquisitions of the thorax based on a concept of flux.
Article in Proceedings of SPIE--the International Society for Optical Engineering, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Techniques for Respiratory Motion-Resolved Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Chest in Children with Spinal or Chest Deformities: A Comprehensive Overview.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Growing rods in Early Onset Scoliosis: The current scenario.Journal of orthopaedics · 2023Article
- Effects of spinal deformities on lung development in children: a review.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2023Review
- Estimation of the dynamic volume of each lung via rapid limited-slice dynamic MRI.Proceedings of SPIE--the International Society for Optical Engineering · 2021Article
- Lung parenchymal characterization via thoracic dynamic MRI in normal children and pediatric patients with TIS.Proceedings of SPIE--the International Society for Optical Engineering · 2021Article
- Regional diaphragm motion analysis via dynamic MRI.Proceedings of SPIE--the International Society for Optical EngineeringArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Retrospective 4D image construction from continuously acquired 2D slices is a necessary step to achieve high-quality 4D images. Self-gating methods, which extract breathing signals only from image information without any external gating technology, have much potential, such as in pediatric patients with thoracic insufficiency syndrome (TIS) who suffer from extreme malformations of the chest wall, diaphragm, and spine, leading to breathing that is very complex with lots of abnormal respiration cycles, including very deep or shallow cycles. Existing methods do not work well in this clinical scenario and most are not fully automatic, requiring some manual interactive operations. In this paper, we propose a fully automatic 4D dMRI construction method based on the concept of flux to address the 4D image construction from 2D slices of subjects with complex respiration. Firstly, we extract the breathing signal for each location based on the flux of the optical flow vector field of the body region from the image series. Then, we give a full analysis for all cycles and extract several normal ones and map them to one cosine respiration model for each location. After that, we re-sample one normal cycle from the respiration model for each location independently. All of these resampled normal cycles form the final constructed 4D image. Qualitative and quantitative evaluations on 25 subjects show that the proposed method can handle datasets from subjects with more complex respiration and achieves good self-consistency results while maintaining time and space continuity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.