Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33052120›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical Internet research2020

The Association Between Electronic Device Use During Family Time and Family Well-Being: Population-Based Cross-Sectional Study.

Sheng Zhi Zhao, Ningyuan Guo, Man Ping Wang, Daniel Yee Tak Fong, Agnes Yuen Kwan Lai, Sophia Siu-Chee Chan, Tai Hing Lam, Daniel Sai Yin Ho

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical Internet research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Sheng Zhi ZhaoSchool of Nursing, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China (Hong Kong).ORCID 0000-0003-3024-0956
Ningyuan GuoSchool of Nursing, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China (Hong Kong).ORCID 0000-0002-1790-3244
Man Ping WangSchool of Nursing, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China (Hong Kong).ORCID 0000-0003-4000-2388
Daniel Yee Tak FongSchool of Nursing, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China (Hong Kong).ORCID 0000-0001-7365-9146
Agnes Yuen Kwan LaiSchool of Nursing, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China (Hong Kong).ORCID 0000-0002-7321-2632
Sophia Siu-Chee ChanSchool of Nursing, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China (Hong Kong).ORCID 0000-0002-6349-3717
Tai Hing LamSchool of Public Health, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China (Hong Kong).ORCID 0000-0002-2033-9971
Daniel Sai Yin HoSchool of Public Health, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China (Hong Kong).ORCID 0000-0001-9485-0273

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundElectronic devices (eDevices) may have positive or negative influences on family communication and well-being depending on how they are used.

objectiveWe examined eDevice use during family time and its association with the quality of family communication and well-being in Hong Kong Chinese adults.

methodsIn 2017, a probability-based 2-stage random sampling landline telephone survey collected data on eDevice use in daily life and during family time (eg, family dinner) and the presence of rules banning eDevice use during family dinner. Family communication quality was rated from 0 to 10 with higher scores being favorable. Family well-being was calculated as a composite mean score of 3 items each using the same scale from 0 to 10. The associations of family communication quality and well-being with eDevice use in daily life and during family time were estimated using beta-coefficient (β) adjusting for sociodemographics. The mediating role of family communication quality in the association between eDevice use and family well-being was analyzed.

resultsOf the 2064 respondents (mean age 56.4 [SD 19.2] years, 1269/2064 [61.48%] female), 1579/2059 (76.69%) used an eDevice daily for a mean of 3.6 hours (SD 0.1) and 257/686 (37.5%) used it for 30+ minutes before sleep. As much as 794/2046 (38.81%) often or sometimes used an eDevice during family time including dinner (311/2017, 15.42%); 713/2012 (35.44%) reported use of an eDevice by family members during dinner. Lower family communication quality was associated with hours of eDevice use before sleep (adjusted β=-.25; 95% CI -0.44 to -0.05), and often use (vs never use) of eDevice during family dinner by oneself (adjusted β=-.51; 95% CI -0.91 to -0.10) and family members (adjusted β=-.54; 95% CI -0.79 to -0.29). Similarly, lower family well-being was associated with eDevice use before sleep (adjusted β=-.26; 95% CI -0.42 to -0.09), and often use during family dinner by oneself (adjusted β=-.48; 95% CI -0.83 to -0.12) and family members (adjusted β=-.50; 95% CI -0.72 to -0.28). Total ban of eDevice use during family dinner was negatively associated with often use by oneself (adjusted odds ratio 0.49; 95% CI 0.29 to 0.85) and family members (adjusted odds ratio 0.41; 95% CI 0.28, 0.60) but not with family communication and well-being. Lower family communication quality substantially mediated the total effect of the association of eDevice use time before sleep (61.2%) and often use at family dinner by oneself (87.0%) and by family members (67.8%) with family well-being.

conclusionseDevice use before sleep and during family dinner was associated with lower family well-being, and the association was substantially mediated by family communication quality. Our results suggest that interventions on smart use of eDevice may improve family communication and well-being.

Indexed as

Cross-Sectional StudiesElectronicsEquipment and SuppliesFamilyFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedeDevicefamily communicationfamily dinnermobile phonepublic healthsmartphonewell-being

Identifiers

PMID33052120
PMCPMC7593857

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.