Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33052112›Full record

ArticleJournal of participatory medicine2018

Utilizing Consumer Technology (Apple's ResearchKit) for Medical Studies by Patients and Researchers: Proof of Concept of the Novel Platform REach.

Marleen Mhj van Gelder, Lucien Jlpg Engelen, Thijs Sondag, Tom H van de Belt

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of participatory medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Marleen Mhj van GelderRadboud REshape Innovation Center, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4853-4434
Lucien Jlpg EngelenRadboud REshape Innovation Center, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8455-9367
Thijs SondagRadboud REshape Innovation Center, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8105-5657
Tom H van de BeltRadboud REshape Innovation Center, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5401-8973

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Medical research suffers from declining response rates, hampering the quest for answers to clinically relevant research questions. Furthermore, objective data on a number of important study variables, such as physical activity, sleep, and nutrition, are difficult to collect with the traditional methods of data collection. Reassuringly, current technological developments could overcome these limitations. In addition, they may enable research being established by patients themselves provided that they have access to a user-friendly platform. Using the features of Apple's ResearchKit, an informed consent procedure, questionnaire, linkage with HealthKit data, and "active tasks" may be administered through a publicly available app. However, ResearchKit requires programming skills, which many patients and researchers lack. Therefore, we developed a platform (REach) with drag and drop functionalities producing a ready-to-use code that can be embedded in existing or new apps. Participants in the pilot study were very satisfied with data collection through REach and measurement error was minimal. In the era of declining participation rates in observational studies and patient involvement, new methods of data collection, such as REach, are essential to ensure that clinically relevant research questions are validly answered. Due to linkage with HealthKit and active tasks, objective health data that are impossible to collect with the traditional methods of data collection can easily be collected.

Indexed as

data collectionHealthKitplatformPRIDE Studysmartphonewearables

Identifiers

PMID33052112
PMCPMC7434096

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.