Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33051854›Full record

ReviewInternational urology and nephrology2021

APD or CAPD: one glove does not fit all.

Athanasios Roumeliotis, Stefanos Roumeliotis, Konstantinos Leivaditis, Marios Salmas, Theodoros Eleftheriadis, Vassilios Liakopoulos

Registry-linked trialOpen access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International urology and nephrology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05449067 (Nocturnal Automated Versus Continuous Ambulatory Peritoneal Dialysis in Patients With End-Stage Kidney Disease), which is not on this map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05449067 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

Nocturnal Automated Versus Continuous Ambulatory Peritoneal Dialysis in Patients With End-Stage Kidney Disease: A Multicenter, Randomized, Open-Label, Crossover Non-Inferiority Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorNanfang Hospital, Southern Medical UniversityRan2022 to 2026Enrolled137ConditionsEnd-Stage Kidney Disease, Peritoneal DialysisArmsNocturnal automated peritoneal dialysis (APD), Continuous Ambulatory Peritoneal Dialysis (CAPD)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Evaluation of the Impact of Remote Monitoring Using the Sharesource Connectivity Platform on Adherence to Automated Peritoneal Dialysis in 51 Patients.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2023
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Brazilian Dialysis Survey 2021.Jornal brasileiro de nefrologia
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Athanasios RoumeliotisDivision of Nephrology and Hypertension, 1st Department of Internal Medicine, AHEPA University Hospital, School of Medicine, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, 1, St. Kyriakidi Street, 54636, Thessaloníki, Greece.
Stefanos RoumeliotisDivision of Nephrology and Hypertension, 1st Department of Internal Medicine, AHEPA University Hospital, School of Medicine, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, 1, St. Kyriakidi Street, 54636, Thessaloníki, Greece.
Konstantinos LeivaditisDivision of Nephrology and Hypertension, 1st Department of Internal Medicine, AHEPA University Hospital, School of Medicine, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, 1, St. Kyriakidi Street, 54636, Thessaloníki, Greece.
Marios SalmasDepartment of Anatomy, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece.
Theodoros EleftheriadisDepartment of Nephrology, Medical School, University of Thessaly, Larissa, Greece.
Vassilios LiakopoulosDivision of Nephrology and Hypertension, 1st Department of Internal Medicine, AHEPA University Hospital, School of Medicine, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, 1, St. Kyriakidi Street, 54636, Thessaloníki, Greece. liakopul@otenet.gr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7564-2724
Aristotle University of Thessaloniki · GRNational and Kapodistrian University of Athens · GRUniversity of Thessaly · GR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The use of Automated Peritoneal Dialysis (APD) in its various forms has increased over the past few years mainly in developed countries. This could be attributed to improved cycler design, apparent lifestyle benefits and the ability to achieve adequacy and ultrafiltration targets. However, the dilemma of choosing the superior modality between APD and Continuous Ambulatory Peritoneal Dialysis (CAPD) has not yet been resolved. When it comes to fast transporters and assisted PD, APD is certainly considered the most suitable Peritoneal Dialysis (PD) modality. Improved patients' compliance, lower intraperitoneal pressure and possibly lower incidence of peritonitis have been also associated with APD. However, concerns regarding increased cost, a more rapid decline in residual renal function, inadequate sodium removal and disturbed sleep are APD's setbacks. Besides APD superiority over CAPD in fast transporters, the other medical advantages of APD still remain controversial. In any case, APD should be readily available for all patients starting PD and the most important indication for its implementation remains patient's choice.

Indexed as

Peritoneal DialysisHumansKidney Failure, ChronicPatient SelectionPeritoneal Dialysis, Continuous AmbulatoryAutomated peritoneal dialysis (APD)Continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD)Fast transportersPatient selection

Identifiers

PMID33051854
PMCPMC7553382
OpenAlexW3092341459

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.