Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33051829›Full record

ArticleSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2021

"Home wasn't really home anymore": Understanding caregivers' perspectives of the impact of blood cancer caregiving on the family system.

Carla L Fisher, Michaela D Mullis, Amanda Kastrinos, Easton Wollney, Elisa S Weiss, Maria Sae-Hau, Carma L Bylund

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
4.7field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Toward Better Conversations: Assessing Caregiver-Child Communication in Pediatric Oncology.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Family mutuality enhances the family resilience of colorectal cancer patients through positive family functioning.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Adult sibling-related experiences while caring for a parent diagnosed with a blood cancer.Families, systems & health : the journal of collaborative family healthcare · 2023
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Cancer control : journal of the Moffitt Cancer Center
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Carla L FisherCollege of Journalism & Communications, UF Health Cancer Center, UF Health Center for Arts in Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA. carlalfisher@ufl.edu.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3903-4278
Michaela D MullisCollege of Journalism & Communications, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.
Amanda KastrinosCollege of Journalism & Communications, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.
Easton WollneyCollege of Journalism & Communications, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.
Elisa S WeissThe Leukemia & Lymphoma Society, Rye Brook, NY, USA.
Maria Sae-HauThe Leukemia & Lymphoma Society, Rye Brook, NY, USA.
Carma L BylundCollege of Journalism & Communications, College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.
University of Florida · USLeukemia and Lymphoma Society · USUniversity of Florida Health · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeResearch on the impact of family cancer caregiving is primarily dyadic in focus. How caregiving affects the larger family system is less understood, yet knowing this is vital to developing supportive resources for caregivers, patients, and their families. To better understand how blood cancer caregiving impacts the family system, we explored the experiences of adult child caregivers of diagnosed parents and parent caregivers of diagnosed children.

methodsWe conducted semi-structured interviews with 39 midlife parent and adult child caregivers of patients with leukemia or lymphoma. Using a family systems theory lens, we conducted a thematic analysis using the constant comparative method to identify how caregiving impacts the larger family system.

resultsCaregivers ranged from age 30 to 64 (M = 43). They described four ways that caregiving impacted themselves and the larger family system: (1) disruption of home life, (2) emotional (dis)connection, (3) juggling competing roles, and (4) developing resiliency and intimacy. Perspectives within each category differed based on their relational role to the patient or in the broader family.

conclusionsThemes identify ways to provide support to both caregiver types. Support care resources could help families navigate gains and losses impacting the family system after a blood cancer diagnosis. Both caregiver types described experiencing (and/or their family experiencing) a loss in relational connection, feeling alone, and members distancing themselves. Both caregiver types also described gains in family functioning, like strengthened bonds and togetherness. Findings validate the need for family-centered support with key areas to address for healthy family functioning.

Indexed as

AdultCaregiversFamilyFemaleHematologic NeoplasmsHumansMaleMiddle AgedBlood cancerCancerCaregivingCopingFamily systemLifespan

Identifiers

PMID33051829
OpenAlexW3092214043

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.