Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33051725›Full record

ArticleJournal of cancer research and clinical oncology2021

Major driver mutations are shared between sinonasal intestinal-type adenocarcinoma and the morphologically identical colorectal adenocarcinoma.

Sannia Sjöstedt, Ane Yde Schmidt, Filipe Garrett Vieira, Gro Linno Willemoe, Tina Klitmøller Agander, Caroline Olsen, Finn Cilius Nielsen, Christian von Buchwald

Erratum issuedOpen access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Genome-wide somatic mutation analysis of sinonasal adenocarcinoma with and without wood dust exposure.Genes and environment : the official journal of the Japanese Environmental Mutagen Society · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Sannia SjöstedtDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery and Audiology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Blegdamsvej 9, 2100, Copenhagen Ø, Denmark. sannia.mia.svenningsen.sjoestedt.01@regionh.dk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8027-5204
Ane Yde SchmidtCenter for Genomic Medicine, Copenhagen University Hospitalet, Blegdamsvej 9, 2100, Copenhagen Ø, Denmark.
Filipe Garrett VieiraCenter for Genomic Medicine, Copenhagen University Hospitalet, Blegdamsvej 9, 2100, Copenhagen Ø, Denmark.
Gro Linno WillemoeDepartment of Pathology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Blegdamsvej 9, 2100, Copenhagen Ø, Denmark.
Tina Klitmøller AganderDepartment of Pathology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Blegdamsvej 9, 2100, Copenhagen Ø, Denmark.
Caroline OlsenDepartment of Pathology, Zealand University Hospital Roskilde, Sygehusvej 10, 4000, Roskilde, Denmark.
Finn Cilius NielsenCenter for Genomic Medicine, Copenhagen University Hospitalet, Blegdamsvej 9, 2100, Copenhagen Ø, Denmark.
Christian von BuchwaldDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery and Audiology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Blegdamsvej 9, 2100, Copenhagen Ø, Denmark.
Copenhagen University Hospital · DKRoskilde Sygehus · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe purpose of our study was to compare genomic changes in sinonasal intestinal-type adenocarcinoma (sITAC) and colorectal adenocarcinoma (CRC), as they are histomorphologically indistinguishable. This can cause diagnostic difficulties as sinonasal tumours initially diagnosed as sITAC may represent metastasis from CRC, a frequent cancer. Previous studies have not uncovered the underlying mechanism behind the histomorphological resemblance. METHODS/PATIENTS: Tissue samples from all consecutive patients with sITAC at our facility (20 patients) were compared to samples from 20 patients with CRC as well as samples from 2 patients with both CRC and sinonasal tumours. DNA sequencing was performed using Illumina TruSight Oncology 500 panel consisting of 523 cancer-associated genes. Frequent mutations were inspected manually using the Integrative Genomics Viewer.

resultsSeveral well-known cancer-associated genes were mutated in the CRC group, but also in the sinonasal ITAC group. These genes included APC mutated in 65% of the CRC group and 37% of the sinonasal ITAC group, and TP53 mutated in 65% of CRC samples and 58% of ITAC samples. These shared mutations may explain the histomorphological similarities. Successful DNA sequencing was performed on the colorectal sample from one of the two patients with both CRC and sinonasal tumour. Comparing mutations in these samples from one patient we have shown that the sinonasal tumour in all probability was a CRC metastasis.

conclusionWe have identified several genetic similarities between sITAC and CRC. This discovery brings us closer to understanding mechanisms behind the development of sITAC-and hopefully in the future targeted therapy.

Indexed as

MutationAdenocarcinomaBiomarkers, TumorColorectal NeoplasmsFollow-Up StudiesHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHumansMaleMiddle AgedParanasal Sinus NeoplasmsPrognosisRetrospective StudiesBiomarkers, TumorCancerDNA sequencingGenomicsIntestinal type adenocarcinomaMutationsSinonasal

Identifiers

PMID33051725
PMCPMC11801883
OpenAlexW3092557439

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.