Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33051674›Full record

ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2021

Learning graph representations of biochemical networks and its application to enzymatic link prediction.

Julie Jiang, Li-Ping Liu, Soha Hassoun

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Julie JiangDepartment of Computer Science, Tufts University, Medford 02155, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4260-282X
Li-Ping LiuDepartment of Computer Science, Tufts University, Medford 02155, USA.
Soha HassounDepartment of Computer Science, Tufts University, Medford 02155, USA.

Funding

Computational Techniques for Advancing Untargeted Metabolomics AnalysisR01GM132391 · NIGMS · TUFTS UNIVERSITY MEDFORD · PI HASSOUN, SOHA · 2019 to 2022
$1.5M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM132391
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

motivationThe complete characterization of enzymatic activities between molecules remains incomplete, hindering biological engineering and limiting biological discovery. We develop in this work a technique, enzymatic link prediction (ELP), for predicting the likelihood of an enzymatic transformation between two molecules. ELP models enzymatic reactions cataloged in the KEGG database as a graph. ELP is innovative over prior works in using graph embedding to learn molecular representations that capture not only molecular and enzymatic attributes but also graph connectivity.

resultsWe explore transductive (test nodes included in the training graph) and inductive (test nodes not part of the training graph) learning models. We show that ELP achieves high AUC when learning node embeddings using both graph connectivity and node attributes. Further, we show that graph embedding improves link prediction by 30% in area under curve over fingerprint-based similarity approaches and by 8% over support vector machines. We compare ELP against rule-based methods. We also evaluate ELP for predicting links in pathway maps and for reconstruction of edges in reaction networks of four common gut microbiota phyla: actinobacteria, bacteroidetes, firmicutes and proteobacteria. To emphasize the importance of graph embedding in the context of biochemical networks, we illustrate how graph embedding can guide visualization. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: The code and datasets are available through https://github.com/HassounLab/ELP.

Indexed as

Machine Learning

Identifiers

PMID33051674
PMCPMC8097755

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.