Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33051583›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2020

Wettability and confinement size effects on stability of water conveying nanotubes.

M Shaat, U Javed, S Faroughi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

M ShaatMechanical Engineering Department, Abu Dhabi University, P.O.BOX 1790, Al Ain, United Arab Emirates. mohamed.i@adu.ac.ae.
U JavedDepartment of Engineering, American University of Iraq Sulaimani (AUIS), Sulaimania, 46001, Iraq.
S FaroughiFaculty of Mechanical Engineering, Urmia University of Technology, Urmia, Iran.

Funding

Abu Dhabi University 19300474Abu Dhabi University 19300475
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study investigates the wettability and confinement size effects on vibration and stability of water conveying nanotubes. We present an accurate assessment of nanotube stability by considering the exact mechanics of the fluid that is confined in the nanotube. Information on the stability of nanotubes in relation to the fluid viscosity, the driving force of the fluid flow, the surface wettability of the nanotube, and the nanotube size is missing in the literature. For the first time, we explore the surface wettability dependence of the nanotube natural frequencies and stability. By means of hybrid continuum-molecular mechanics (HCMM), we determined water viscosity variations inside the nanotube. Nanotubes with different surface wettability varying from super-hydrophobic to super-hydrophilic nanotubes were studied. We demonstrated a multiphase structure of nanoconfined water in nanotubes. Water was seen as vapor at the interface with the nanotube, ice shell in the middle, and liquid water in the nanotube core. The average velocity of water flow in the nanotube was obtained strongly depend on the surface wettability and the confinement size. In addition, we report the natural frequencies of the nanotube as functions of the applied pressure and the nanotube size. Mode divergence and flutter instabilities were observed, and the activation of these instabilities strongly depended on the nanotube surface wettability and size. This work gives important insights into understanding the stability of nanotubes conveying fluids depending on the operating pressures and the wettability and size of confinement. We revealed that hydrophilic nanotubes are generally more stable than hydrophobic nanotubes when conveying fluids.

Identifiers

PMID33051583
PMCPMC7555514

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.