ArticleScientific reports2020
Comparison of three lymph node staging systems in evaluating the prognosis of patients with pT3 esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.
Article in Scientific reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- ASO Author Reflections: Refining Early Recurrence Risk with LODDS in cT3 Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma.Annals of surgical oncology · 2026Article
- Log Odds of Positive Lymph Nodes Improves Risk Stratification for Early Recurrence and Survival After Radical Esophagectomy for cT3 Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma.Annals of surgical oncology · 2026Article
- Re-evaluation of the relationship between PrPc expression and patient prognosis in primary esophageal squamous cell carcinoma and primary hepatocellular carcinoma.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Prognostic significance of lymph node ratio in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: insights from the South Asian population.Frontiers in oncology · 2024Article
- Prognostic prediction and comparison of three staging programs for patients with advanced (T2-T4) esophageal squamous carcinoma after radical resection.Frontiers in oncology · 2024Article
- Log odds of positive lymph nodes is a robust predictor of survival and benefits from postoperative radiotherapy in stage IIIA-N2 resected non-small cell lung cancer.Thoracic cancer · 2022Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To explore the prognostic value of three lymph node staging systems, including number of positive lymph nodes (pN), lymph node ratio (LNR), and log odds of positive lymph nodes (LODDS), in patients with pT3 stage esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). Data from 1667 patients with pT3 stage ESCC who underwent surgical resection were reviewed. The log-rank test was used to assess the differences in overall survival (OS) between groups. Multivariate analysis was performed to identify independent prognostic factors. The receiver operating characteristic curve was used to assess the prognostic accuracy of the three staging methods. The median survival time for the entire group was 48.0 months, and the 1-, 3- and 5-year OS rates were 83.9%, 55.1% and 66.6%, respectively. All three lymph node staging systems were significantly correlated with OS in univariate and multivariate analyses. However, LNR and LODDS staging systems could more accurately predict survival than the pN staging system in patients with < 15 lymph nodes dissected, while LODDS have the best prognostic homogeneity. All three staging systems could be used for prognostic assessment in pT3 stage ESCC. But LODDS staging system might be superior to the others due to its prognostic homogeneity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.