ArticleScientific reports2020
Perceiving amputee gait from biological motion: kinematics cues and effect of experience level.
Article in Scientific reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Projecting the new body: How body image evolves during learning to walk with a wearable robot.PNAS nexus · 2026Article
- Human factors considerations of Interaction between wearers and intelligent lower-limb prostheses: a prospective discussion.Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation · 2024Review
- Sprinting performance of individuals with unilateral transfemoral amputation: compensation strategies for lower limb coordination.Royal Society open science · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Physical therapists (PT) and clinicians must be skilled in identifying gait features through observation to assess motor deficits in patients and intervene appropriately. Inconsistent results in the literature have led researchers to question how clinical experience influences PT's gait perception and to seek the key kinematic features that should be trained to enhance PT's skill. Thus, this study investigated (1) what are the informative kinematic features that allow gait-deviation perception in amputee gait and (2) whether there are differences in observational gait skills between PT and individuals with less clinical experience (PT students [PTS] and Novices). We introduced a new method that combines biological motion and principal component analysis to gradually mesh amputee and typical walking patterns. Our analysis showed that on average the accuracy rate in identifying gait deviations between PT and PTS was similar and better than Novices. Also, we found that PT's experience was demonstrated by their better perception of gait asymmetry. The extracted principal components demonstrated that the major gait deviation of amputees was the medial-lateral body sway and spatial gait asymmetry.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.