Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33051262›Full record

ArticleG3 (Bethesda, Md.)2020

Estimation of Molecular Pairwise Relatedness in Autopolyploid Crops.

Rodrigo R Amadeu, Leticia A C Lara, Patricio Munoz, Antonio A F Garcia

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in G3 (Bethesda, Md.), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Construction of relatedness matrices in autopolyploid populations using low-depth high-throughput sequencing data.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2024
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Rodrigo R AmadeuHorticultural Sciences Department, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL.ORCID 0000-0001-5127-4448
Leticia A C LaraThe Roslin Institute and Royal (Dick) School of Veterinary Studies, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-0593-5003
Patricio MunozHorticultural Sciences Department, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL.ORCID 0000-0001-8973-9351
Antonio A F GarciaDepartment of Genetics, Luiz de Queiroz College of Agriculture, University of São Paulo, Brazil augusto.garcia@usp.br.ORCID 0000-0003-0634-3277

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A suitable pairwise relatedness estimation is key to genetic studies. Several methods are proposed to compute relatedness in autopolyploids based on molecular data. However, unlike diploids, autopolyploids still need further studies considering scenarios with many linked molecular markers with known dosage. In this study, we provide guidelines for plant geneticists and breeders to access trustworthy pairwise relatedness estimates. To this end, we simulated populations considering different ploidy levels, meiotic pairings patterns, number of loci and alleles, and inbreeding levels. Analysis were performed to access the accuracy of distinct methods and to demonstrate the usefulness of molecular marker in practical situations. Overall, our results suggest that at least 100 effective biallelic molecular markers are required to have good pairwise relatedness estimation if methods based on correlation is used. For this number of loci, current methods based on multiallelic markers show lower performance than biallelic ones. To estimate relatedness in cases of inbreeding or close relationships (as parent-offspring, full-sibs, or half-sibs) is more challenging. Methods to estimate pairwise relatedness based on molecular markers, for different ploidy levels or pedigrees were implemented in the AGHmatrix R package.

Indexed as

InbreedingModels, GeneticAllelesDiploidyPedigreeRelationship Polyploid Autotetraploid Mendelian sampling variance Molecular marker SNP

Identifiers

PMID33051262
PMCPMC7718764

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.