Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33051235›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2020

Association between hyperemesis gravidarum and psychological symptoms, psychosocial outcomes and infant bonding: a two-point prospective case-control multicentre survey study in an inner city setting.

Nicola Mitchell-Jones, Kim Lawson, Shabnam Bobdiwala, Jessica Alice Farren, Aurelio Tobias, Tom Bourne, Cecilia Bottomley

Open access · goldAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 50 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Diagnosis and treatment of hyperemesis gravidarum.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2024
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Nicola Mitchell-JonesDepartment of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, Imperial College NHS Trust, St Mary's Hospital and Queen Charlotte's and Chelsea Hospital, London, UK nicola.mitchell-jones@nhs.net.ORCID 0000-0003-0299-9586
Kim LawsonDepartment of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, Imperial College NHS Trust, St Mary's Hospital and Queen Charlotte's and Chelsea Hospital, London, UK.
Shabnam BobdiwalaDepartment of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, Imperial College NHS Trust, St Mary's Hospital and Queen Charlotte's and Chelsea Hospital, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-0540-2191
Jessica Alice FarrenDepartment of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, Imperial College NHS Trust, St Mary's Hospital and Queen Charlotte's and Chelsea Hospital, London, UK.
Aurelio TobiasInstitute of Metabolism and Systems Research (IMSR), University of Birmingham, Birmingham Women's NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK.
Tom BourneDepartment of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, Imperial College NHS Trust, St Mary's Hospital and Queen Charlotte's and Chelsea Hospital, London, UK.
Cecilia BottomleyDepartment of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, Imperial College NHS Trust, St Mary's Hospital and Queen Charlotte's and Chelsea Hospital, London, UK.
St Mary's Hospital · GBBirmingham Women’s and Children’s NHS Foundation Trust · GBImperial College Healthcare NHS Trust · GBUniversity College Hospital · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo assess if there is any association between hyperemesis gravidarum (HG), psychological morbidity and infant bonding and to quantify any psychosocial consequences of HG.

designTwo-point prospective case-control, multicentre survey study with antenatal and postnatal data collection.

settingThree London hospitals.

participantsPregnant women at ≤12 completed weeks gestation recruited consecutively over 2 years. Women with HG were recruited at the time of admission; controls recruited from a low risk antenatal clinic. 106 women were recruited to the case group and 108 to the control. Response rates at antenatal data collection were 87% and 85% in the case and control groups, respectively. Postnatally, the response rate was 90% in both groups. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Primary outcomes were psychological morbidity in the antenatal and postnatal periods, infant bonding in the postnatal period and psychosocial implications of HG. Secondary outcomes were the effects of severity and longevity of HG and assessment of correlation between Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale scores and maternal-to-infant bonding scores.

resultsAntenatally, 49% of cases had probable depression compared with 6% of controls (OR 14.4 (5.29 to 39.44)). Postnatally, 29% of cases had probable depression versus 7% of controls (OR 5.2 (1.65 to 17.21)). There was no direct association between HG and infant bonding. 53% of women in the HG group reported needing four or more weeks of sick leave compared with 2% in the control group (OR 60.5 (95% CI 8.4 to 2535.6)).

conclusionsLong-lasting psychological morbidity associated with HG was evident. Significantly more women in the case group sought help for mental health symptoms in the antenatal period, however very few were diagnosed with or treated for depression in pregnancy or referred to specialist perinatal mental health services. HG did not directly affect infant bonding. Women in the case group required long periods off work, highlighting the socioeconomic impact of HG.

Indexed as

Hyperemesis GravidarumCase-Control StudiesFemaleHumansInfantLondonPregnancyProspective StudiesSurveys and Questionnairesgynaecologymental healthreproductive medicinesocial medicine

Identifiers

PMID33051235
PMCPMC7554497
OpenAlexW3092356539

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.