Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33051056›Full record

ArticleWomen's health issues : official publication of the Jacobs Institute of Women's Health

Experiences of Breastfeeding among Disabled Women.

Erin E Andrews, Robyn M Powell, Kara B Ayers

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Women's health issues : official publication of the Jacobs Institute of Women's Health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Peripartum disease activity in moderately and severely disabled women with multiple sclerosis.Multiple sclerosis journal - experimental, translational and clinical
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Erin E AndrewsVA Texas Valley Coastal Bend Health Care System, Harlingen, Texas; Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Dell Medical School, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas. Electronic address: erin.andrews2@va.gov.
Robyn M PowellThe Lurie Institute for Disability Policy, The Heller School for Social Policy and Management, Brandeis University, Waltham, Massachusetts; Stetson University College of Law, Gulfport, Florida.
Kara B AyersDivision of Developmental and Behavioral Pediatrics, University of Cincinnati Center for Excellence in Developmental Disabilities (UCCEDD), Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio; Department of Pediatrics, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio.
Baptist Health System · USCincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center · USStetson University · US

Funding

ACL HHS 90DPGE0001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAlthough breastfeeding has been extensively studied, there remains a paucity of data about the breastfeeding experiences of disabled women. Despite indications of similar pregnancy rates, disabled women seem to breastfeed at lower rates. Emerging research on the intersection of breastfeeding and disability has begun to shed light on how aspects of disability may impact breastfeeding.

methodsThis digital and participatory action research study used semistructured video or telephone interviews to evaluate the experiences of breastfeeding among 24 disabled women through descriptive content analysis. The cross-disability sample was composed of women with self-identified intellectual, developmental, physical, sensory, and psychiatric disabilities. Some women had multiple disabilities.

resultsQualitative analysis revealed four themes relating to breastfeeding among disabled women: 1) communication difficulties with lactation consultants, 2) milk supply and latch problems, 3) intense pressure to breastfeed, and 4) positive interactions with health care providers.

conclusionsThis study provides new information about the breastfeeding experiences of women with disabilities. Our findings suggest that disabled women should be better supported in their breastfeeding decisions and require greater access to disability-affirmative and informative clinical resources and accessible communication.

Indexed as

Breast FeedingPersons with DisabilitiesCommunicationFemaleHealth PersonnelHumansMothersPregnancyQualitative Research

Identifiers

PMID33051056
PMCPMC9531779
OpenAlexW3091790659

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.