Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33050974›Full record

Trial reportPublic health nutrition2021

Enhancing the potential effects of text messages delivered via an m-health intervention to improve packing of healthy school lunchboxes.

Alison Brown, Rachel Sutherland, Lisa Janssen, Nayerra Hudson, Amelia Chooi, Renee Reynolds, Alison Walton, Christophe Lecathelinais, Kathryn Reilly, Nicole Nathan and 1 more

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Public health nutrition, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Alison BrownSchool of Medicine and Public Health, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-4233-7467
Rachel SutherlandSchool of Medicine and Public Health, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW, Australia.
Lisa JanssenHunter New England Population Health, Locked Bag 10, Wallsend, NSW2287, Australia.
Nayerra HudsonSchool of Medicine and Public Health, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW, Australia.
Amelia ChooiSchool of Medicine and Public Health, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW, Australia.
Renee ReynoldsSchool of Medicine and Public Health, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW, Australia.
Alison WaltonMid North Coast Local Health District Health Promotion, Kempsey, NSW, Australia.
Christophe LecathelinaisSchool of Medicine and Public Health, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW, Australia.
Kathryn ReillySchool of Medicine and Public Health, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW, Australia.
Nicole NathanSchool of Medicine and Public Health, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW, Australia.
Luke WolfendenSchool of Medicine and Public Health, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe aim of the study was to assess the impact of different lunchbox messages on parents' intention to pack a healthy lunchbox.

designThis study employed an experimental design.

settingA series of messages were developed to align with the six constructs of the Health Belief Model. Messages were also developed that were (and were not) personalised and varied based on the source of the information provided (university, school, dietitian and health promotion service). During a telephone survey, participants were read the content of each message and asked about their intention to pack a healthy lunchbox.

participantsParents of primary school-aged children were randomised to receive different messages to encourage the packing of healthy lunchboxes.

resultsThe study was completed by 511 parents. Linear mixed regression analyses identified significant differences (P < 0·05) in intention scores between variant messages targeting the same behavioural constructs for 'susceptibility', 'severity', 'benefits' and 'barriers' but not 'cues to action' or 'self-efficacy'. The highest mean behavioural intention score was for 'benefits', whilst the lowest mean score was for 'barriers'. There were no significant differences in intention scores of parents receiving messages from a dietitian, university, health promotion team or school (P = 0·37). Intention scores did not differ in which messages were personalised based on child's name (P = 0·84) or grade level (P = 0·54).

conclusionsThe findings suggest that messages that focus on the benefits of packing healthy lunchboxes may be particularly useful in improving intentions of parents to pack healthy foods for their children to consume at school.

Indexed as

TelemedicineText MessagingChildHealth PromotionHumansParentsSchoolsChild dietChildrenHealth Belief ModelMessage developmentParentsSchool lunchboxesText messaging

Identifiers

PMID33050974
PMCPMC9884787

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.