Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33050940›Full record

ArticleOrphanet journal of rare diseases2020

Patient reported outcome measures in a large cohort of patients with type 1 Gaucher disease.

Tama Dinur, Majdolen Istaiti, Dafna Frydman, Michal Becker-Cohen, Jeff Szer, Ari Zimran, Shoshana Revel-Vilk

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Orphanet journal of rare diseases, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Gaucher disease, state of the art and perspectives.Journal of internal medicine · 2025
    Review
  5. MyGauchmHealth · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. A patient with Gaucher disease and plasma cell dyscrasia: bidirectional impact.Hematology. American Society of Hematology. Education Program · 2020
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Tama DinurGaucher Unit, Shaare Zedek Medical Centre, P.O. Box 3235, 91031, Jerusalem, Israel.
Majdolen IstaitiGaucher Unit, Shaare Zedek Medical Centre, P.O. Box 3235, 91031, Jerusalem, Israel.
Dafna FrydmanGaucher Unit, Shaare Zedek Medical Centre, P.O. Box 3235, 91031, Jerusalem, Israel.
Michal Becker-CohenGaucher Unit, Shaare Zedek Medical Centre, P.O. Box 3235, 91031, Jerusalem, Israel.
Jeff SzerPeter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, Australia.
Ari ZimranGaucher Unit, Shaare Zedek Medical Centre, P.O. Box 3235, 91031, Jerusalem, Israel.
Shoshana Revel-VilkGaucher Unit, Shaare Zedek Medical Centre, P.O. Box 3235, 91031, Jerusalem, Israel. srevelvilk@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0001-9151-0337
Shaare Zedek Medical Center · ILHebrew University of Jerusalem · ILThe Royal Melbourne Hospital · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIt is now acknowledged that the input of patients in health outcome assessment is vital to understanding the impact of diseases and interventions for those diseases. This study is the first report of patient-reported outcome measures (PROM) in a large cohort of patients with type 1 Gaucher disease (GD1) enabling us to study predictors of the reported outcomes.

methodThe PROM was sent via a mobile phone survey to 405 adult patients with GD1. Demographics, clinical data, and treatment status were extracted from clinic charts. Age, sex, severity score index (SSI) at presentation and treatment status were used as variables to assess outcomes.

resultsA total of 192 patients with GD1 (111 females) responded (47.4% response rate), of whom 124 (64.5%) had received GD1-specific therapy. Around 40% of patients reported that GD had restricted their education/job and fun activities and were concerned about being emotional and financial burdens on others. Concerns regarding the risk of bone disease and Parkinson disease were also high (60%). The severity of GD1 (reflected by the need for GD1-specific therapy and a high SSI) was associated with GD1-related restrictions and concerns, fatigue, physical weakness, bone pain, and worry regarding the future.

conclusionsThe use of GD1 specific PROM highlights personal problems that are not captured by traditional outcome parameters and that need to be addressed to improve health-related quality of life. Validated PROM should be included among the outcome measures in clinical practice and future prospective studies for patients with chronic and rare diseases.

Indexed as

Gaucher DiseaseAdultCohort StudiesFemaleHumansPatient Reported Outcome MeasuresProspective StudiesQuality of LifeAdult patientsGaucher diseaseMobile surveyPatients reported outcomeQuality of life

Identifiers

PMID33050940
PMCPMC7556970
OpenAlexW3092157717

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.