Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33050926›Full record

ArticleHead & face medicine2020

Clinicopathological features of 214 maxillary sinus pathologies. A ten-year single-centre retrospective clinical study.

Mario Pérez-Sayáns, José M Suárez Peñaranda, Juan Antonio Suárez Quintanilla, Cintia M Chamorro Petronacci, Abel García García, Andrés Blanco Carrión, Pilar Gándara Vila, Yolanda Guerrero Sánchez

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Head & face medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. A Retrospective Analysis of Clinicopathological Features in 117 Isolated Maxillary Sinus Pathologies in a Tertiary Care Hospital.Indian journal of otolaryngology and head and neck surgery : official publication of the Association of Otolaryngologists of India · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Mario Pérez-SayánsHealth Research Institute of Santiago (IDIS), Oral Medicine, Oral Surgery and Implantology Unit (MedOralRes), Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Santiago de Compostela, C.P. 15782, Santiago de Compostela, Spain. perezsayans@gmail.com.
José M Suárez PeñarandaPathological Anatomy Service, University Hospital Complex of Santiago (CHUS), C.P. 15782, Santiago de Compostela, Spain.
Juan Antonio Suárez QuintanillaArea of Human Anatomy and Embryology, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Santiago de Compostela, C.P. 15782, Santiago de Compostela, Spain.
Cintia M Chamorro PetronacciHealth Research Institute of Santiago (IDIS), Oral Medicine, Oral Surgery and Implantology Unit (MedOralRes), Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Santiago de Compostela, C.P. 15782, Santiago de Compostela, Spain.
Abel García GarcíaHealth Research Institute of Santiago (IDIS), Oral Medicine, Oral Surgery and Implantology Unit (MedOralRes), Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Santiago de Compostela, C.P. 15782, Santiago de Compostela, Spain.
Andrés Blanco CarriónHealth Research Institute of Santiago (IDIS), Oral Medicine, Oral Surgery and Implantology Unit (MedOralRes), Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Santiago de Compostela, C.P. 15782, Santiago de Compostela, Spain.
Pilar Gándara VilaHealth Research Institute of Santiago (IDIS), Oral Medicine, Oral Surgery and Implantology Unit (MedOralRes), Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Santiago de Compostela, C.P. 15782, Santiago de Compostela, Spain.
Yolanda Guerrero SánchezArea oh Human Anatomy and Psychobiology, University of Murcia, Murcia, Spain.

Funding

Fundación Séneca 20783/PI/18Ministerio de Ciencia, Innovación y Universidades PGC2018-097198-BI00
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDiagnosis of maxillary sinus pathology must include the clinical radiological study (CRS) and histopathological analysis. The aim of this study is 1) to describe the clinicopathological features of maxillary sinus lesions, obtained successively in a single medical centre over the last 10 years and 2) to determine the sensitivity and specificity for the diagnosis of malignant lesions based exclusively on the CRS.

methodsIt is a single-centre observational retrospective clinical study on patients who attended the University Hospital Complex of Santiago de Compostela (CHUS) with sinus pathologies during the period of 2009-2019.

resultsThe sample consisted of 133 men (62.1%) and 81 women (37.9%), with an average age of 46.9 years (SD = 18.8). In terms of frequency, the most frequent pathology was the unspecified sinusitis (44.4%), followed by polyps (18.2%), malignant tumours (9.8%), inverting papilloma (7.5%), fungal sinusitis (4.7%), cysts (3.7%), benign tumours (2.3%), mucocele (2.3%) and other lesions (1.9%). Cysts and benign tumours were diagnosed earliest Vs malignant tumours (65.2 years (SD = 16.1)) were diagnosed the latest (p < 0.001). Based only on the CRS for malignancies, diagnostic indexes were 71.4% sensitivity and 97.9% specificity, with a Kappa value of 0.68 with (p < 0.001).

conclusionMaxillary sinus pathology is very varied with therapeutic and prognostic repercussions. CRS is sometimes insufficient and histopathological confirmation is essential.

Indexed as

Maxillary SinusSinusitisFemaleHumansMaleMaxillary Sinus NeoplasmsMiddle AgedMucoceleNasal PolypsRetrospective StudiesTomography, X-Ray ComputedClinic radiological studyDiagnostic indexesHistopathologyMalignant tumoursMaxillary sinus pathology

Identifiers

PMID33050926
PMCPMC7552481

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.