Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33050918›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental health : a global access science source2020

The dietary risk index system: a tool to track pesticide dietary risks.

Charles M Benbrook, Donald R Davis

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental health : a global access science source, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Addressing systemic problems with exposure assessments to protect the public's health.Environmental health : a global access science source · 2023
    Review
  7. Additives in Children's Nutrition-A Review of Current Events.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Review
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Charles M BenbrookBenbrook Consulting Services, 10526 SE Vashon Vista Drive, Port Orchard, WA, 98367, USA. charlesbenbrook@gmail.com.
Donald R DavisBiochemical Institute, The University of Texas, Austin, TX, 78712, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8343-1268

Funding

Alton Jones Foundation n/aBenbrook Consulting Services n/aConsumers Union n/aFord Foundation n/aGerber Products Company n/aIPM Institute of North America n/aJoyce Foundation n/aSoil Association (UK) n/aThe Organic Center n/aThe Sheepdrove Trust (UK) n/a
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFor years the United States Department of Agriculture's Pesticide Data Program and the United Kingdom's Food Standards Agency have published annual or quarterly data on pesticide residues in foods. Both programs report residues in conventionally grown, organic, and imported foods. The US program has tested about 288,000 food samples since 1992, primarily fruits and vegetables consumed by children. Since 1999 the UK has tested about 72,000 samples of a wider range of foods. These data are vital inputs in tracking trends in pesticide dietary risks.

methodsThe Dietary Risk Index (DRI) system facilitates detailed analyses of US and UK pesticide residue data, trends, and chronic risk distributions. The DRI value for a pesticide is the dietary intake of that pesticide from a single serving of food divided by the pesticide's acceptable daily intake as set by the US Environmental Protection Agency. It can be calculated based on average annual residue concentrations, and on residue levels in individual samples of food. DRI values can be aggregated over multiple pesticides in single foods, and over individual pesticides in multiple foods.

resultsThe DRI system provides insights into the levels, trends, and distribution of pesticide dietary risk across most widely consumed foods. By drawing on both US Pesticide Data Program and UK-Food Standards Agency residue data, the DRI is capable of assessing pesticide risks in a significant portion of the global food supply. Substantial reductions in pesticide dietary risks occurred in the early 2000s, primarily from replacement of organophosphate insecticides with seemingly lower-risk neonicotinoids. However, there remain several areas of concern and opportunities to reduce risks. Both herbicide and fungicide dietary risks are rising. Organically grown produce poses risks far lower than corresponding, conventionally grown produce. Risk differences are inconsistent between domestic and imported foods.

conclusionsThe surest ways to markedly reduce pesticide dietary risks are to shift relatively high-risk fruits and vegetables to organic production. For other foods, reducing reliance on pesticides overall, and especially high-risk pesticides, will incrementally lower risks. The DRI system can help focus such efforts and track progress in reducing pesticide dietary risk.

Indexed as

DietAge FactorsFood ContaminationFruitHumansPesticide ResiduesPesticidesRisk AssessmentUnited KingdomUnited StatesVegetablesPesticide ResiduesPesticidesAcceptable daily intakeAntifungal agentsChronic reference doseFood quality protection actGlyphosateHerbicidesNeonicotinoidsOrganophosphate insecticidesPesticide dietary riskResidues in food

Identifiers

PMID33050918
PMCPMC7557078

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.