ArticleBMC biology2020
Population structure and pharmacogenomic risk stratification in the United States.
Article in BMC biology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.
- High-quality Population-specific Haplotype-resolved Reference Panel in the Genomic and Pangenomic Eras.Genomics, proteomics & bioinformatics · 2025Review
- Empirical Drug Dosage Validates Pharmacogenomic Associations in All of Us.Clinical and translational science · 2025Article
- Population Genetics of Pharmacogenetic Variants in a Greek Psychiatric Cohort of over 3000 Individuals.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
- Pharmacogenomics-Based Detection of Variants Involved in Pain, Anti-inflammatory and Immunomodulating Agents Pathways by Whole Exome Sequencing and DeepIranian journal of medical sciences · 2025Article
- Pharmacogenomics and genetic ancestry in Colombia: a study on all variant drug annotations of PharmGKB.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2025Article
- Scoping review of enablers and challenges of implementing pharmacogenomics testing in the primary care settings.BMJ open · 2024Article
- Rare variants in pharmacogenes influence clozapine metabolism in individuals with schizophrenia.European neuropsychopharmacology : the journal of the European College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2024Article
- Population Pharmacogenomics for Health Equity.Genes · 2023Article
- Review
- Race, Ethnicity, and Pharmacogenomic Variation in the United States and the United Kingdom.Pharmaceutics · 2023Article
- The frequency of majorPharmacogenomics · 2023Article
- A Comprehensive Analysis of 21 Actionable Pharmacogenes in the Spanish Population: From Genetic Characterisation to Clinical Impact.Pharmaceutics · 2023Article
- The Apportionment of Pharmacogenomic Variation: Race, Ethnicity, and Adverse Drug Reactions.Medical research archives · 2022Article
- Genetic Ancestry Inference for Pharmacogenomics.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2022Article
- Article
- Evaluation of population-level pharmacogenetic actionability in Alabama.Clinical and translational science · 2021Article
- Translational Pharmacogenomics: Discovery, Evidence Synthesis and Delivery of Race-Conscious Medicine.Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPharmacogenomic (PGx) variants mediate how individuals respond to medication, and response differences among racial/ethnic groups have been attributed to patterns of PGx diversity. We hypothesized that genetic ancestry (GA) would provide higher resolution for stratifying PGx risk, since it serves as a more reliable surrogate for genetic diversity than self-identified race/ethnicity (SIRE), which includes a substantial social component. We analyzed a cohort of 8628 individuals from the United States (US), for whom we had both SIRE information and whole genome genotypes, with a focus on the three largest SIRE groups in the US: White, Black (African-American), and Hispanic (Latino). Our approach to the question of PGx risk stratification entailed the integration of two distinct methodologies: population genetics and evidence-based medicine. This integrated approach allowed us to consider the clinical implications for the observed patterns of PGx variation found within and between population groups.
resultsWhole genome genotypes were used to characterize individuals' continental ancestry fractions-European, African, and Native American-and individuals were grouped according to their GA profiles. SIRE and GA groups were found to be highly concordant. Continental ancestry predicts individuals' SIRE with > 96% accuracy, and accordingly, GA provides only a marginal increase in resolution for PGx risk stratification. In light of the concordance between SIRE and GA, taken together with the fact that information on SIRE is readily available to clinicians, we evaluated PGx variation between SIRE groups to explore the potential clinical utility of race and ethnicity. PGx variants are highly diverged compared to the genomic background; 82 variants show significant frequency differences among SIRE groups, and genome-wide patterns of PGx variation are almost entirely concordant with SIRE. The vast majority of PGx variation is found within rather than between groups, a well-established fact for almost all genetic variants, which is often taken to argue against the clinical utility of population stratification. Nevertheless, analysis of highly differentiated PGx variants illustrates how SIRE partitions PGx variation based on groups' characteristic ancestry patterns. These cases underscore the extent to which SIRE carries clinically valuable information for stratifying PGx risk among populations, albeit with less utility for predicting individual-level PGx alleles (genotypes), supporting the concept of population pharmacogenomics.
conclusionsPerhaps most interestingly, we show that individuals who identify as Black or Hispanic stand to gain far more from the consideration of race/ethnicity in treatment decisions than individuals from the majority White population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.