Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33050888›Full record

ArticleBMC plant biology2020

The mechanism of potato resistance to Globodera rostochiensis: comparison of root transcriptomes of resistant and susceptible Solanum phureja genotypes.

Alex V Kochetov, Anastasiya A Egorova, Anastasiya Y Glagoleva, Kseniya V Strygina, Elena K Khlestkina, Sophia V Gerasimova, Natalja V Shatskaya, Gennady V Vasilyev, Dmitry A Afonnikov, Nikolay A Shmakov and 5 more

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC plant biology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. PotatoBSLnc: a curated repository of potato long noncoding RNAs in response to biotic stress.Database : the journal of biological databases and curation · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Plant Biology and Biotechnology: Focus on Genomics and Bioinformatics.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Alex V KochetovInstitute of Cytology and Genetics, SB RAS, Novosibirsk, 630090, Russia. ak@bionet.nsc.ru.
Anastasiya A EgorovaInstitute of Cytology and Genetics, SB RAS, Novosibirsk, 630090, Russia.
Anastasiya Y GlagolevaInstitute of Cytology and Genetics, SB RAS, Novosibirsk, 630090, Russia.
Kseniya V StryginaVavilov Institute of Plant Genetic Resources (VIR), Saint Petersburg, 190000, Russia.
Elena K KhlestkinaInstitute of Cytology and Genetics, SB RAS, Novosibirsk, 630090, Russia.
Sophia V GerasimovaInstitute of Cytology and Genetics, SB RAS, Novosibirsk, 630090, Russia.
Natalja V ShatskayaInstitute of Cytology and Genetics, SB RAS, Novosibirsk, 630090, Russia.
Gennady V VasilyevInstitute of Cytology and Genetics, SB RAS, Novosibirsk, 630090, Russia.
Dmitry A AfonnikovInstitute of Cytology and Genetics, SB RAS, Novosibirsk, 630090, Russia.
Nikolay A ShmakovInstitute of Cytology and Genetics, SB RAS, Novosibirsk, 630090, Russia.
Olga Y AntonovaVavilov Institute of Plant Genetic Resources (VIR), Saint Petersburg, 190000, Russia.
Natalia V AlpatyevaVavilov Institute of Plant Genetic Resources (VIR), Saint Petersburg, 190000, Russia.
Alexander KhiuttiAll Russian Research Institute for Plant Protection, Saint Petersburg, 196608, Russia.
Olga S AfanasenkoAll Russian Research Institute for Plant Protection, Saint Petersburg, 196608, Russia.
Tatjana A GavrilenkoVavilov Institute of Plant Genetic Resources (VIR), Saint Petersburg, 190000, Russia.
Institute of Cytology and Genetics · RUN.I. Vavilov Research Institute of Plant Industry · RUSiberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences · RUAll-Russian Institute of Plant Protection · RUNovosibirsk State University · RU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGlobodera rostochiensis belongs to major potato pathogens with a sophisticated mechanism of interaction with roots of the host plants. Resistance of commercial varieties is commonly based on specific R genes introgressed from natural populations of related wild species and from native potato varieties grown in the Andean highlands. Investigation of molecular resistance mechanisms and screening the natural populations for novel R genes are important for both fundamental knowledge on plant pathogen interactions and breeding for durable resistance. Here we exploited the Solanum phureja accessions collected in South America with contrasting resistance to G. rostochiensis.

resultsThe infestation of S. phureja with G. rostochiensis juveniles resulted in wounding stress followed by activation of cell division and tissue regeneration processes. Unlike the susceptible S. phureja genotype, the resistant accession reacted by rapid induction of variety of stress response related genes. This chain of molecular events accompanies the hypersensitive response at the juveniles' invasion sites and provides high-level resistance. Transcriptomic analysis also revealed considerable differences between the analyzed S. phureja genotypes and the reference genome.

conclusionThe molecular processes in plant roots associated with changes in gene expression patterns in response to G. rostochiensis infestation and establishment of either resistant or susceptible phenotypes are discussed. De novo transcriptome assembling is considered as an important tool for discovery of novel resistance traits in S. phureja accessions.

Indexed as

AnimalsDisease ResistanceGene OntologyGenotypePlant DiseasesPlant RootsSolanumTranscriptomeTylenchoideaGlobodera rostochiensisNematodePotatoResistanceSolanum phurejaTranscriptome

Identifiers

PMID33050888
PMCPMC7557027
OpenAlexW3092452517

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.