Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33050779›Full record

ArticleJournal of the Royal Society, Interface2020

Endoskeletal mineralization in chimaera and a comparative guide to tessellated cartilage in chondrichthyan fishes (sharks, rays and chimaera).

Ronald Seidel, Michael Blumer, Júlia Chaumel, Shahrouz Amini, Mason N Dean

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the Royal Society, Interface, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
4.7field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Mineralization of theFrontiers in genetics · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Ronald SeidelB CUBE-Center for Molecular Bioengineering, Technical University Dresden, 01307 Dresden, Germany.
Michael BlumerMedical University Innsbruck, Division of Clinical and Functional Anatomy, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria.
Júlia ChaumelMax Planck Institute of Colloids and Interfaces, Department of Biomaterials, 14424 Potsdam, Germany.
Shahrouz AminiMax Planck Institute of Colloids and Interfaces, Department of Biomaterials, 14424 Potsdam, Germany.
Mason N DeanMax Planck Institute of Colloids and Interfaces, Department of Biomaterials, 14424 Potsdam, Germany.
Max Planck Institute of Colloids and Interfaces · DEInnsbruck Medical University · AT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

An accepted uniting character of modern cartilaginous fishes (sharks, rays, chimaera) is the presence of a mineralized, skeletal crust, tiled by numerous minute plates called tesserae. Tesserae have, however, never been demonstrated in modern chimaera and it is debated whether the skeleton mineralizes at all. We show for the first time that tessellated cartilage was not lost in chimaera, as has been previously postulated, and is in many ways similar to that of sharks and rays. Tesserae in

Indexed as

SharksAnimalsCalcification, PhysiologicCartilageChimeraFishesSkeletonbiomineralizationcartilaginous fishtessellated cartilagetesseraevertebrate endoskeleton

Identifiers

PMID33050779
PMCPMC7653374
OpenAlexW3092180031

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.