ArticleMicroorganisms2020
RBUD: A New Functional Potential Analysis Approach for Whole Microbial Genome Shotgun Sequencing.
Article in Microorganisms, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Whole metagenome shotgun sequencing is a powerful approach to detect the functional potential of microbial communities. Currently, the read-based metagenomics profiling for established database (RBED) method is one of the two kinds of conventional methods for species and functional annotations. However, the databases, which are established based on test samples or specific reference genomes or protein sequences, limit the coverage of global microbial diversity. The other assembly-based metagenomics profiling for unestablished database (ABUD) method has a low utilization rate of reads, resulting in a lot of biological information loss. In this study, we proposed a new method, read-based metagenomics profiling for unestablished database (RBUD), based on Metagenome Database of Global Microorganisms (MDGM), to solve the above problems. To evaluate the accuracy and effectiveness of our method, the intestinal bacterial composition and function analyses were performed in both avian colibacillosis chicken cases and type 2 diabetes mellitus patients. Comparing to the existing methods, RBUD is superior in detecting proteins, percentage of reads mapping and ontological similarity of intestinal microbes. The results of RBUD are in better agreement with the classical functional studies on these two diseases. RBUD also has the advantages of fast analysis speed and is not limited by the sample size.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.