Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33050401›Full record

Trial reportNutrients2020

Telephone-Delivered Dietary Intervention in Patients with Age-Related Macular Degeneration: 3-Month Post-Intervention Findings of a Randomised Controlled Trial.

Diana Tang, Paul Mitchell, Gerald Liew, George Burlutsky, Victoria M Flood, Bamini Gopinath

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Nutrients, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Diana TangCentre for Vision Research, Department of Ophthalmology and Westmead Institute for Medical Research, University of Sydney, Camperdown, NSW 2006, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-2007-9054
Paul MitchellCentre for Vision Research, Department of Ophthalmology and Westmead Institute for Medical Research, University of Sydney, Camperdown, NSW 2006, Australia.
Gerald LiewCentre for Vision Research, Department of Ophthalmology and Westmead Institute for Medical Research, University of Sydney, Camperdown, NSW 2006, Australia.
George BurlutskyCentre for Vision Research, Department of Ophthalmology and Westmead Institute for Medical Research, University of Sydney, Camperdown, NSW 2006, Australia.
Victoria M FloodSydney School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, NSW 2006, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-5310-7221
Bamini GopinathCentre for Vision Research, Department of Ophthalmology and Westmead Institute for Medical Research, University of Sydney, Camperdown, NSW 2006, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-3573-359X
The University of Sydney · AU

Funding

National Health and Medical Research Council APP1150101
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There is an evidence-practice gap between the dietary recommendations for age-related macular degeneration (AMD) presented in the literature and those practiced by patients. This study reports on the 3-month post-intervention results of a randomised controlled trial (RCT) evaluating telephone-delivered counselling to improve dietary behaviours among AMD patients. A total of 155 AMD patients (57% female, aged 78 ± 8 years; control: 78, intervention: 77), primarily residing in New South Wales, Australia, were recruited. Participants completed a baseline questionnaire and a short dietary questionnaire (SDQ-AMD). The intervention included an evidence-based nutrition resource and four monthly calls with a dietitian. Immediately post-intervention, intervention participants repeated the SDQ-AMD and completed a feedback form. At 3 months post-intervention, both study arms repeated the SDQ-AMD. Statistical analyses included

Indexed as

DietNutritionistsAgedAged, 80 and overAustraliaDiet TherapyEatingFeeding BehaviorFemaleHumansKnowledgeMacular DegenerationMaleNutritional Physiological PhenomenaPatient SatisfactionRemote Consultationage-related macular degenerationeducationnutritiontelehealth

Identifiers

PMID33050401
PMCPMC7650817
OpenAlexW3085546503

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.