Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33050382›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2020

Application of the MSAP Technique to Evaluate Epigenetic Changes in Plant Conservation.

María Elena González-Benito, Miguel Ángel Ibáñez, Michela Pirredda, Sara Mira, Carmen Martín

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Cytogenomic profiling ofJournal of ginseng research · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Strategies for the Conservation of Plant Genetic Resources.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2026
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. DNA Methylation in Plant Responses and Adaption to Abiotic Stresses.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

María Elena González-BenitoDepartamento de Biotecnología-Biología Vegetal, Escuela Técnica Superior de Ingeniería Agronómica, Alimentaria y de Biosistemas, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, Av. Puerta de Hierro, nº 2-4, 28040 Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-6330-332X
Miguel Ángel IbáñezDepartamento de Economía Agraria, Estadística y Gestión de Empresas, Escuela Técnica Superior de Ingeniería Agronómica, Alimentaria y de Biosistemas, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, Av. Puerta de Hierro, nº 2-4, 28040 Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-5761-5119
Michela PirreddaDepartamento de Biotecnología-Biología Vegetal, Escuela Técnica Superior de Ingeniería Agronómica, Alimentaria y de Biosistemas, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, Av. Puerta de Hierro, nº 2-4, 28040 Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-8223-8260
Sara MiraDepartamento de Biotecnología-Biología Vegetal, Escuela Técnica Superior de Ingeniería Agronómica, Alimentaria y de Biosistemas, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, Av. Puerta de Hierro, nº 2-4, 28040 Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-0164-5156
Carmen MartínDepartamento de Biotecnología-Biología Vegetal, Escuela Técnica Superior de Ingeniería Agronómica, Alimentaria y de Biosistemas, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, Av. Puerta de Hierro, nº 2-4, 28040 Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-8667-7116

Funding

Spanish Government, (MINECO/FEDER) AGL2015-64899-C2-1-P
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Epigenetic variation, and particularly DNA methylation, is involved in plasticity and responses to changes in the environment. Conservation biology studies have focused on the measurement of this variation to establish demographic parameters, diversity levels and population structure to design the appropriate conservation strategies. However, in ex situ conservation approaches, the main objective is to guarantee the characteristics of the conserved material (phenotype and epi-genetic). We review the use of the Methylation Sensitive Amplified Polymorphism (MSAP) technique to detect changes in the DNA methylation patterns of plant material conserved by the main ex situ plant conservation methods: seed banks, in vitro slow growth and cryopreservation. Comparison of DNA methylation patterns before and after conservation is a useful tool to check the fidelity of the regenerated plants, and, at the same time, may be related with other genetic variations that might appear during the conservation process (i.e., somaclonal variation). Analyses of MSAP profiles can be useful in the management of ex situ plant conservation but differs in the approach used in the in situ conservation. Likewise, an easy-to-use methodology is necessary for a rapid interpretation of data, in order to be readily implemented by conservation managers.

Indexed as

CryopreservationDNA MethylationEpigenesis, GeneticGenetic VariationNucleic Acid Amplification TechniquesAmplified Fragment Length Polymorphism AnalysisData AnalysisDNA, PlantModels, StatisticalPhenotypeSeedsDNA, PlantcryopreservationDNA methylationmultinomial modelplant tissue cultureseed storage

Identifiers

PMID33050382
PMCPMC7589462

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.