Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33050273›Full record

SynthesisInternational journal of environmental research and public health2020

The Effects of Upper-Body Exoskeletons on Human Metabolic Cost and Thermal Response during Work Tasks-A Systematic Review.

Simona Del Ferraro, Tiziana Falcone, Alberto Ranavolo, Vincenzo Molinaro

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Trends in Robotics Research in Occupational Safety and Health: A Scientometric Analysis and Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Simona Del FerraroINAIL-Department of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, Epidemiology and Hygiene-Laboratory of Ergonomics and Physiology, via Fontana Candida 1, 00078 Monte Porzio Catone, Rome, Italy.
Tiziana FalconeINAIL-Department of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, Epidemiology and Hygiene-Laboratory of Ergonomics and Physiology, via Fontana Candida 1, 00078 Monte Porzio Catone, Rome, Italy.
Alberto RanavoloINAIL-Department of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, Epidemiology and Hygiene-Laboratory of Ergonomics and Physiology, via Fontana Candida 1, 00078 Monte Porzio Catone, Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-0197-6166
Vincenzo MolinaroINAIL-Department of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, Epidemiology and Hygiene-Laboratory of Ergonomics and Physiology, via Fontana Candida 1, 00078 Monte Porzio Catone, Rome, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNew wearable assistive devices (exoskeletons) have been developed for assisting people during work activity or rehabilitation. Although exoskeletons have been introduced into different occupational fields in an attempt to reduce the risk of work-related musculoskeletal disorders, the effectiveness of their use in workplaces still needs to be investigated. This systematic review focused on the effects of upper-body exoskeletons (UBEs) on human metabolic cost and thermophysiological response during upper-body work tasks.

methodsarticles published until 22 September 2020 were selected from Scopus, Web of Science, and PubMed for eligibility and the potential risk of bias was assessed.

resultsNine articles resulted in being eligible for the metabolic aspects, and none for the thermal analysis. All the studies were based on comparisons between conditions with and without exoskeletons and considered a total of 94 participants (mainly males) performing tasks involving the trunk or overhead work, 7 back-support exoskeletons, and 1 upper-limb support exoskeleton. Eight studies found a significant reduction in the mean values of the metabolic or cardiorespiratory parameters considered and one found no differences.

conclusionsThe reduction found represents a preliminary finding that needs to be confirmed in a wider range of conditions, especially in workplaces, where work tasks show different characteristics and durations compared to those simulated in the laboratory. Future developments should investigate the dependence of metabolic cost on specific UBE design approaches during tasks involving the trunk and the possible statistical correlation between the metabolic cost and the surface ElectroMyoGraphy (sEMG) parameters. Finally, it could be interesting to investigate the effect of exoskeletons on the human thermophysiological response.

Indexed as

Energy MetabolismExoskeleton DeviceWorkBiomechanical PhenomenaBody TemperatureElectromyographyHumansMaleUpper Extremityexoskeletonslifting taskmetabolic costoccupational healthoverhead workoxygen consumptionthermal comfortwearable assistive devicework-related musculoskeletal disorders

Identifiers

PMID33050273
PMCPMC7600262

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.