Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33050197›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2020

Construct Validity and Reliability of the Work Environment Assessment Instrument WE-10.

Rudy de Barros Ahrens, Luciana da Silva Lirani, Antonio Carlos de Francisco

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Rudy de Barros AhrensDepartment of Business, Faculty Sagrada Família (FASF), Ponta Grossa, PR 84010-760, Brazil.
Luciana da Silva LiraniDepartment of Health Sciences Center, State University Northern of Paraná (UENP), Jacarezinho, PR 86400-000, Brazil.
Antonio Carlos de FranciscoDepartment of Industrial Engineering and Post-Graduation in Production Engineering, Federal University of Technology-Paraná (UTFPR), Ponta Grossa, PR 84017-220, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-0401-4445

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to validate the construct and reliability of an instrument to assess the work environment as a single tool based on quality of life (QL), quality of work life (QWL), and organizational climate (OC). The methodology tested the construct validity through Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA) and reliability through Cronbach's alpha. The EFA returned a Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin (KMO) value of 0.917; which demonstrated that the data were adequate for the factor analysis; and a significant Bartlett's test of sphericity (

Indexed as

Quality of LifeSurveys and QuestionnairesWorkplaceFactor Analysis, StatisticalHumansReproducibility of Resultsorganizational climatequality of lifequality of work liferesearch instrumentwork environment

Identifiers

PMID33050197
PMCPMC7600521

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.