Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33050180›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2020

Factors Impacting Risk Perception under Typhoon Disaster in Macao SAR, China.

Yajing Shen, Shiyan Lou, Xiujuan Zhao, Kuai Peng Ip, Hui Xu, Jingwen Zhang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Public Knowledge, Perceptions and Practices in the High-Risk Lightning Zone of South Africa.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Yajing ShenInstitute of Analytical Psychology, City University of Macao, Macao 999078, China.
Shiyan LouFaculty of Finance, City University of Macao, Macao 999078, China.
Xiujuan ZhaoDepartment of Engineering Physics, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China.
Kuai Peng IpResearch Center for Macao Social and Economic Development, City University of Macao, Macao 999078, China.
Hui XuInstitute of Analytical Psychology, City University of Macao, Macao 999078, China.
Jingwen ZhangInstitute of Analytical Psychology, City University of Macao, Macao 999078, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Studying typhoon risk perception and its influencing factors help reveal potential risk factors from the perspective of the public and provide a basis for decision-making for reducing the risk of typhoon disasters. The purpose of this study is to assess the risk perception and related factors of Macao residents in China. Information was collected from 983 participants using a structured questionnaire with an effective utilization rate of 94.2%. Descriptive statistics, univariate analysis and correlation analysis were used to analyze the data. The results show that, on the one hand, there are significant differences in risk perception on the factors included: (1) age, education and other demographic characteristics; (2) health status, occupation, length of stay, residence area, residence floor, family organization structure and individuals monthly income and other personal or family conditions; (3) channels and quantity of typhoon information acquisition; (4) degree of mastery of relevant risk aversion knowledge. On the other hand, some factors still have a moderate or high level of correlation with risk perception: (1) The older the respondent, the lower the education level, the lower the income, the lower the risk perception of property damage, health impact and life threat. (2) The more children or elderly people in the family, the higher the risk perception of respondents. (3) The more risk knowledge, the lower the risk perception. (4) The more channels for obtaining information, the lower the fear level and the overall impact of risk perception. (5) The stronger the risk perception, the more positive disaster response behaviors would be taken by the public. In addition, the more information acquisition channels and the less risk knowledge respondents have, the greater the risk perception of the overall impact and the fear of the typhoon; the fewer information access channels and less risk knowledge respondents have, the greater the risk perceptions of property damage, health effects and life threats.

Indexed as

Cyclonic StormsPerceptionRisk AssessmentAgedChildFemaleHumansMacauMalePublic OpinionRisk FactorsSurveys and Questionnairesactive response to disasterinformation acquisition channelsknowledgerisk perceptiontyphoon disaster

Identifiers

PMID33050180
PMCPMC7601195

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.