Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33050136›Full record

ReviewBiomimetics (Basel, Switzerland)2020

Biomimetic Hybrid Systems for Tissue Engineering.

Omid Yousefzade, Ramaz Katsarava, Jordi Puiggalí

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Omid YousefzadeDepartament d'Enginyeria Química, Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya, Escola d'Enginyeria de Barcelona Est-EEBE, 08019 Barcelona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-5717-435X
Ramaz KatsaravaInstitute of Chemistry and Molecular Engineering, Agricultural University of Georgia, Kakha Bedukidze Univesity Campus, Tbilisi 0131, Georgia.ORCID 0000-0002-2373-1514
Jordi PuiggalíDepartament d'Enginyeria Química, Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya, Escola d'Enginyeria de Barcelona Est-EEBE, 08019 Barcelona, Spain.

Funding

Generalitat de Catalunya 2017SGR373ISTC A-2289Shota Rustaveli National Science Foundation FR17-102Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness RTI2018-101827-B-I00
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Tissue engineering approaches appear nowadays highly promising for the regeneration of injured/diseased tissues. Biomimetic scaffolds are continuously been developed to act as structural support for cell growth and proliferation as well as for the delivery of cells able to be differentiated, and also of bioactive molecules like growth factors and even signaling cues. The current research concerns materials employed to develop biological scaffolds with improved features as well as complex preparation techniques. In this work, hybrid systems based on natural polymers are discussed and the efforts focused to provide new polymers able to mimic proteins and DNA are extensively explained. Progress on the scaffold fabrication technique is mentioned, those processes based on solution and melt electrospinning or even on their combination being mainly discussed. Selection of the appropriate hybrid technology becomes vital to get optimal architecture to reasonably accomplish the final applications. Representative examples of the recent possibilities on tissue regeneration are finally given.

Indexed as

biomimetic DNAbiomimetic proteinsbiomimetic scaffoldshard and soft tissues regenerationhybrid technologiesmelt electrospinningstem cellstissue engineering

Identifiers

PMID33050136
PMCPMC7709492

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.