Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33050093›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2020

Evaluation of Inertial Sensor Data by a Comparison with Optical Motion Capture Data of Guitar Strumming Gestures.

Sérgio Freire, Geise Santos, Augusto Armondes, Eduardo A L Meneses, Marcelo M Wanderley

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Sérgio FreireLaboratory for Performance with Interactive Systems (LaPIS), Federal University of Minas Gerais (UFMG), Belo Horizonte 31270-901, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-5072-3114
Geise SantosReasoning for Complex Data Lab (RECOD), Institute of Computing (IC), University of Campinas (UNICAMP), Campinas 13083-852, Brazil.
Augusto ArmondesLaboratory for Performance with Interactive Systems (LaPIS), Federal University of Minas Gerais (UFMG), Belo Horizonte 31270-901, Brazil.
Eduardo A L MenesesInput Devices and Music Interaction Laboratory (IDMIL)/Centre for Interdisciplinary Research in Music Media and Technology (CIRMMT), McGill University, Montreal, QC H3A 0G4, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-3161-5078
Marcelo M WanderleyInput Devices and Music Interaction Laboratory (IDMIL)/Centre for Interdisciplinary Research in Music Media and Technology (CIRMMT), McGill University, Montreal, QC H3A 0G4, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-9169-4313
Centre for Interdisciplinary Research in Music Media and Technology · CAUniversidade Federal de Minas Gerais · BRUniversidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP) · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Computing technologies have opened up a myriad of possibilities for expanding the sonic capabilities of acoustic musical instruments. Musicians nowadays employ a variety of rather inexpensive, wireless sensor-based systems to obtain refined control of interactive musical performances in actual musical situations like live music concerts. It is essential though to clearly understand the capabilities and limitations of such acquisition systems and their potential influence on high-level control of musical processes. In this study, we evaluate one such system composed of an inertial sensor (MetaMotionR) and a hexaphonic nylon guitar for capturing strumming gestures. To characterize this system, we compared it with a high-end commercial motion capture system (Qualisys) typically used in the controlled environments of research laboratories, in two complementary tasks: comparisons of rotational and translational data. For the rotations, we were able to compare our results with those that are found in the literature, obtaining RMSE below 10° for 88% of the curves. The translations were compared in two ways: by double derivation of positional data from the mocap and by double integration of IMU acceleration data. For the task of estimating displacements from acceleration data, we developed a compensative-integration method to deal with the oscillatory character of the strumming, whose approximative results are very dependent on the type of gestures and segmentation; a value of 0.77 was obtained for the average of the normalized covariance coefficients of the displacement magnitudes. Although not in the ideal range, these results point to a clearly acceptable trade-off between the flexibility, portability and low cost of the proposed system when compared to the limited use and cost of the high-end motion capture standard in interactive music setups.

Indexed as

GesturesMusicAccelerationEquipment DesignHumansMovementguitar strumminginteractive musicMetaMotionRmotion captureQualisyssensors for music

Identifiers

PMID33050093
PMCPMC7583031
OpenAlexW3092021092

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.