Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33050025›Full record

ReviewCancers2020

Multiple Myeloma: An Overview of the Current and Novel Therapeutic Approaches in 2020.

Arthur Bobin, Evelyne Liuu, Niels Moya, Cécile Gruchet, Florence Sabirou, Anthony Lévy, Hélène Gardeney, Laly Nsiala, Laura Cailly, Stéphanie Guidez and 6 more

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cancers, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Monoclonal Antibodies: The Greatest Resource to Treat Multiple Myeloma.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Arthur BobinDepartment of Hematology, and CIC1402 INSERM Unit, Poitiers University Hospital, 2 Rue de la Milétrie, 86021 Poitiers, France.
Evelyne LiuuDepartment of Geriatric Medicine, Poitiers University Hospital, 2 Rue de la Milétrie, 86021 Poitiers, France.
Niels MoyaDepartment of Hematology, and CIC1402 INSERM Unit, Poitiers University Hospital, 2 Rue de la Milétrie, 86021 Poitiers, France.
Cécile GruchetDepartment of Hematology, and CIC1402 INSERM Unit, Poitiers University Hospital, 2 Rue de la Milétrie, 86021 Poitiers, France.
Florence SabirouDepartment of Hematology, and CIC1402 INSERM Unit, Poitiers University Hospital, 2 Rue de la Milétrie, 86021 Poitiers, France.
Anthony LévyDepartment of Hematology, and CIC1402 INSERM Unit, Poitiers University Hospital, 2 Rue de la Milétrie, 86021 Poitiers, France.
Hélène GardeneyDepartment of Hematology, and CIC1402 INSERM Unit, Poitiers University Hospital, 2 Rue de la Milétrie, 86021 Poitiers, France.
Laly NsialaDepartment of Hematology, and CIC1402 INSERM Unit, Poitiers University Hospital, 2 Rue de la Milétrie, 86021 Poitiers, France.
Laura CaillyDepartment of Hematology, and CIC1402 INSERM Unit, Poitiers University Hospital, 2 Rue de la Milétrie, 86021 Poitiers, France.
Stéphanie GuidezDepartment of Hematology, and CIC1402 INSERM Unit, Poitiers University Hospital, 2 Rue de la Milétrie, 86021 Poitiers, France.
Cécile TomowiakDepartment of Hematology, and CIC1402 INSERM Unit, Poitiers University Hospital, 2 Rue de la Milétrie, 86021 Poitiers, France.
Thomas SystchenkoDepartment of Internal Medicine, Châtellerault Hospital Center, 1 rue du Dr Luc Montagnier, 86106 Châtellerault, France.
Vincent JavaugueDepartment of Nephrology, Poitiers University Hospital, 2 Rue de la Milétrie, 86021 Poitiers, France.
Géraldine DurandDepartment of Rhumatology, Poitiers University Hospital, 2 Rue de la Milétrie, 86021 Poitiers, France.
Xavier LeleuDepartment of Hematology, and CIC1402 INSERM Unit, Poitiers University Hospital, 2 Rue de la Milétrie, 86021 Poitiers, France.
Mathieu PuyadeDepartment of Internal Medicine, and CIC1402 INSERM unit, Poitiers University Hospital, 2 Rue de la Milétrie, 86021 Poitiers, France.ORCID 0000-0002-5639-0138
Inserm · FRCEA Le Ripault · FRUniversité de Poitiers · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The survival rate of multiple myeloma (MM) patients has drastically increased recently as a result of the wide treatment options now available. Younger patients truly benefit from these innovations as they can support more intensive treatment, such as autologous stem cell transplant or multiple drug association (triplet, quadruplet). The emergence of immunotherapy allowed new combinations principally based on monoclonal anti-CD38 antibodies for these patients. Still, the optimal induction treatment has not been found yet. While consolidation is still debated, maintenance treatment is now well acknowledged to prolong survival. Lenalidomide monotherapy is the only drug approved in that setting, but many innovations are expected. Older patients, now logically named not transplant-eligible, also took advantage of these breakthrough innovations as most of the recent drugs have a more acceptable safety profile than previous cytotoxic agents. For this heterogenous subgroup, geriatric assessment has become an essential tool to identify frail patients and provide tailored strategies. At relapse, options are now numerous, especially for patients who were not treated with lenalidomide, or not refractory at least. Concerning lenalidomide refractory patients, approved combinations are lacking, but many trials are ongoing to fill that space. Moreover, innovative therapeutics are increasingly being developed with modern immunotherapy, such as chimeric antigen receptor T-cells (CAR-T cells), bispecific antibodies, or antibody-drug conjugates. For now, these treatments are usually reserved to heavily pre-treated patients with a poor outcome. MM drug classes have tremendously extended from historical alkylating agents to current dominant associations with proteasome inhibitors, immunomodulatory agents, and monoclonal anti-CD38/anti SLAMF7 antibodies. Plus, in only a couple of years, several new classes will enter the MM armamentarium, such as cereblon E3 ligase modulators (CELMoDs), selective inhibitors of nuclear export, and peptide-drug conjugates. Among the questions that will need to be answered in the years to come is the position of these new treatments in the therapeutic strategy, as well as the role of minimal residual disease-driven strategies which will be a key issue to elucidate. Through this review, we chose to enumerate and comment on the most recent advances in MM therapeutics which have undergone major transformations over the past decade.

Indexed as

immunotherapymultiple myelomanovel agentsrelapsetransplant

Identifiers

PMID33050025
PMCPMC7600346
OpenAlexW3092155144

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.